It is a mistake of simplification to dismiss all religions based on the fact that most adherents feel that there way is the only way. If you listed 10,000 different faiths, sects, religions, etc. and they were all mutually exclusive, then it does not follow logically that they must all be wrong. It is possible for one to be right, no matter how unpopular the idea may be. Christianity is supported by mountains of objective and verifiable evidences and is not a blind leap of faith. "Holy" is just a term of respect for the writings esteemed by beleivers. I did not make the claims found in Scripture, I simply believe them.

I find it way more Arrogant for a person to dismiss out of hand the claims of the bible because of their negative predisposition to religion in general. How much time did you spend in study and contemplation before you decided that God can't be who he claims to be in the Bible? What was the clincher?

I used to argue against the existence of God also, but after taking the time to examine the claims, I am intellectualy compelled to except the overwhelming proofs.

So, are you just another on railing against religion and Christian's in particular or do you have an actual point of contention?