Quote Originally Posted by amsterdam
hahahahahahahahah,as for the ANWAR,we would only use .001% of the land.

and the people that LIVE there are all for it,so are the teamsters,and the eskimos(the only people within a hundred miles).

the only yahoos against it live in san francisco and new york and have NO idea what they are talking about,.lol.peeons.
Damn right, we'll only use a little bit of the land up there. It'll be a spider web of pipelines and roads that covers the entire region of ANWR, but in total land coverage, thanks to convenience of math that we can spout off to those leftist Nazis over and over again, it'll only be considered a small fraction of the total area.
bhallg2k Reviewed by bhallg2k on . Real Priorities iThe owner of Democratic Underground posted this at DU, a lot of this stuff is from the democrats agenda for the 109th congress, it's good to see them using it strategically like this.: Nuclear Option: What happens? (Democratic Agenda for America) Edited on Mon Apr-25-05 08:40 AM by Skinner I got this by email, so I will re-reprint in its entirety. These bills look like great stuff... Nuclear Option: What happens? Rating: 5