The 9/11 WTC Collapses:Questions the Media Won't Address

[amsterdam]

if pisshead read that, he knew i was sarcastic

[Marlboroman]

if pisshead read that, he knew i was sarcastic

I was talking about me beleiveing you.

[Hydrizzle]

Jesus christ, the internet is full of garbage Pisshead, don't believe everything you read like some kind of zombie. whatreallyhappened.org? Give me a fucking break, this is just some crazy conspiracy-theorist's webpage he made on his spare time. C'mon man, you don't really think that someone in our gov't intentionally cause 9/11? Thats just stupid.

[pisshead]

it's links to videos and interviews with firefighters and the firefighters tapes' from that day totally contradicting the story we've been told and lots of more stuff...you don't have to look at it if you don't want to. they've simply archived it. they didn't make up what they have there.

i certainly don't believe 19 hijackers who hate freedom managed to pull this off, there are simply too many things they couldn't have done.

there are lots of unanswered important questions.

[Hydrizzle]

19 hijackers couldn't have done this? Have you ever been on a plane pisshead? They don't keep the pilot's doors locked, they keep them open! IT would so easy to get in there and kill the pilots, then use your flying skills to fly it right into the buildings. What's so hard to believe? I know; it isn't hard to believe at all; you just WANT to believe it was the big, bad government on some massive conspiracy to take us to war for oil. Yes that has to be it, it CAN'T be that maybe there are a bunch of crazy muslim fuckers that want us dead because we help Isreal.... no that can't be it....

[pisshead]

okay. it's there if you want to look at it. if you don't, fine.

i've spent the last 3+ years going over this stuff over and over and over and over, and i haven't reached these conclusions lightly. those are links to video evidence and congressional testimony...there's more to the story than 4 planes and 19 hijackers.

[yocass]

marlboroman... I doubt amsterdam wrote that post for you. Sorry to burst your bubble. And pisshead.. yes, a wild comspiracy theory that has been debunked by numerous people. Spend some research on why those theories arent correct. Ill debunk one for you myself! Ok they all say a fire cant cause a bulding collapse, and quote some building that was on fire for a very very very long time. Then they say diesel fuel couldnt have caused the damage. The fact is, the building wasnt on fire, diesel wasnt on fire, JET FUEL was on fire. Thousands of gallons. The WTC people were misquoted saying it could withstand a jet impact. it DID withstand a jet impact. It didnt survive 20,000 gallons of jet fuel melting steel. (it can, buy some jetfuel and steel and see for yourself).

[Hydrizzle]

I looked through it, and the bullshit runs so deep you would need an excavator to get it all out.


PS I was gonna say what yocass just said, Im just too high right now...

[pisshead]

firefighters all up and down the building, with PUPICLY AVAILABLE firefighter transmissions from that day that you can actually hear and really exist, found small pockets of fire. you can see people standing and waving in the impact sites of the buildings before they collapsed, standing on melting steel they are not.

the fires didn't get nearly hot enough to melt steel. of course, a proper investigation could have been done if the buildings weren't sent overseas as fast as possible.

multiple engineers involved with the construction of those buildings, and if you're familiar with the construction, it has a massive steel core, and they were certain it could withstand multiple jet impacts. it was built with that in mind.

you're calling a lot of firefighters who were in the buildings that day conspiracy theorists too.

how do you explain larry sliverstein's comments regarding building 7? have you heard of building 7?

[Hydrizzle]

Im sure the "small pockets of fire" were cause my the massive shaking the building underwent at the collision. The weight of the building on the top caused the bottom to collapse. This argument is pointless; despite what you think, your scource is utter garbage. Please don't continue unless you come up with a better scource.