Feds to shut it down!!

[boaz]

Seems like a good political move by Obama.

It will help get some right-wingers on his side.

Meanwhile the liberals that this will mostly affect... well let's just say Obama knows he could kick their mothers in the face and still get their votes so he obviously has nothing to worry about.

I seem to recall him saying he wouldn't do stuff like this? I just hope people remember his true colors next November.

yeah, its about on queue for that act, but whats kinda scary is that this is exactly how Clinton started, his mafia came under attack so he diverted all attention to attacking medical cannabis and molesting his interns to divert attention. and it worked. politicians suck balls. every f'n one. :twocents:

[boaz]

Any variety of things can be said about what has been brewing out of Wash DC, but at this point, a perception of desperation becoming evermore apparent.

In the streets there is a "let them eat cake" moment coming up on the horizon.

This entire scenario is like a bug looking for a windshield.

I can see it now, as the strategy evolves from deep within the bowels of the Wash DC politburo apparatcheks

Never mind the over $750 billion given to the "too big to fail" Wall Street banking cartel crime cabal, with no oversight of any kind . . . and to this very day all the banks are giving back to the citizenry is the splintery broomstick proctology exam treatment.

Never mind the trillions . . . yes, trillions of dollars that simply can't be accounted for, sort of "missing" from the books as it were.

Oh, but wait, don't touch that dial.

Fear not, for we can solve the most dangerous, evil threat to face the nation today!

Shut down those sinister dens of subversion - those evil cannabis collectives!

Round up the usual suspects!!!

Um . . . seems there's something a bit wrong with this picture, don't you think . . . just maybe?

my personal feeling is all these protests were orchastrated by Barry. Remember his marching orders "get on your boots and march" or some shit like that. so this is the MSNBC/Democrat astro turf in response to the FNC/Republican tea party astroturf (although from I understand the Tea Party was originally more truly grass roots but was taken over by them).

I think the purpose is to keep our attention away from their gun running operations. Its Mena/Contra Cocaine kinda shit all over again. they need something really big to keep everyones attention. and of course, once things are totally out of control then we will need some new unconstitional sweeping federal mandate to protect us from these "mobs" :twocents:

[IndicaArie]

The elites never like to have there authority questioned. Its really no difference than trying to argue with a cop. They will not argue with you, they will stomp you. Watch your backs and watch out for agent provocateurs.

What is an "agent provocateur"?

[Weezard]

What is an "agent provocateur"?

", French for "inciting agent(s)") is a person employed by the police or other entity to act undercover to entice or provoke another person to commit an illegal act. More generally, the term may refer to a person or group that seeks to discredit or harm another by provoking them to commit a wrong or rash action."

Google is painless.

Aloha,
Weezard

[killerweed420]

They are being used more and more because the courts have failed to address this issue. It is and has always been illegal for a LEO to commit or case a crime to be committed. But you're asking the same people to prosecute themselves, ain't going to happen. This again is another instance where its important for people to get on juries and if there's any testimony that an officer or under cover informant committed a crime then vote for acquittal. The justice system is doing nothing about the police corruption so jurors are going to have to remedy this.

[painretreat]

Weeze, you a Google wizard! pr

[killerweed420]

I think most people are beginning to feel the same way. There are enormous issues facing this country and they're all coming to a head in the same time period. If you look at history it either means a paradigm shift in a society, such as russia had a few years ago, or we slide further into tyranny. At this point I think its pretty hard to tell which way we will go. The elites tend to like to operate in secrecy and while they certainly want to remove some of our unalienable rights, they usually don't publicly say so. But its clear the rich want to invade every aspect of our lives through either government intimidation or through financial ruin.
And don't kid yourselves. If we want to retain these unalienable rights we will have to fight for them. Its nice to be pro peace or anti violence but history teaches us that nothing is ever resolved attempts at peaceful resolution. It would be nice if democracy could be made to work but it seems to always break down when money becomes an issue.

[ogganjagrower]

wont stop cali from blowing the finest