Results 71 to 79 of 79
-
05-07-2005, 07:45 AM #71
Senior Member
With Republicans Like These, Who Needs Democrats?
Where's the proof? How many times can I say it? Where's the proof? Our special forces were deployed to Afghanistan, because they are more suited to the job over there! Afghanistan is a much more rural and mountanous country, so its not as suited for the regualar army. You are naive if you think that Osama would have been captured if the regular army was there. Osama bin Laden has a massive terrorist network supproting him, and a huge country to hide in. These accusations that our troops are wantonly killing civilians are competely unbased, ignorant, and downright unpatriotic. Being a soldier is a honest job and a great service and you tarnish it by making these crazy claims.
Originally Posted by Marlboroman
Umm, I think the bounty for Osama is at about $50,000,000, which is enough for any Afghan to live like a king. Your ignorance is quite franky astounding. You thin that the US is some kind of omnipitent being? Our intellegence is flawed, as you have said, so how would we instinctively know where he is? I'd say Osama is probably smarter than Saddam, which is why he hasn't been captured yet.
Originally Posted by Marlboroman
-
05-07-2005, 07:46 AM #72
Senior Member
With Republicans Like These, Who Needs Democrats?
Oh, and BTW, Amsterdam is one of the only people that even make sense on this website.
-
05-08-2005, 05:34 AM #73
Senior Member
With Republicans Like These, Who Needs Democrats?
Originally Posted by Hydrizzle
Ok you should go back and read the previuos posts because you are only seeing a portion of a conversation....
If you had read it you would have seen that I'm not claiming regular army would have caught Osama, I'm saying our troops were not there to capture Osama.
Afganistan is not a very large country.
I never said a single negative word about being a soldier as a proffesion.And I never claimed they are killing civilians.
your view that there is this massive terror organization is simple fear campaighn conditioning.
As far as being unpatriotic... well thats just not true. I love the United States, I simply dont like the political shift towards a police state. BTW even our founding fathers were called rebels, thats translates to terrorist allot these days.
Well since you seem to know his bounty I would question whether you looked it up beofre posting. But since you so wantingly throw the word igonorant around. Ill tell you whats really ignorant is to think that even a single Afgani would see a single cent of $50,000,000 to turn anyone in.
And as far as being smarter than Saddam, well shit I guess he would have to be to evade the worlds most fearsom fighting forces being a 7 foot giant with kidney problems.
Its so funny that you and your other so called "right-wing" pals hold our GOV and its long arm for justice in such high regard, yet you beleive them when they say they cant find this man. These are the same guys that can read a newspaper from space.
Truth is I hold their ability in even higher regard than you. As you beleive them when they say they cant find him,(makeing them incompitent)
I beleive they know just where he is.(simply makeing them liars)
-
05-08-2005, 03:45 PM #74
OPSenior Member
With Republicans Like These, Who Needs Democrats?
the patriot act makes the founders and those who fought the revolution terrorists. literally, section 802 of the patrtiot act makes them terrorists.
-
05-08-2005, 04:39 PM #75
Senior Member
With Republicans Like These, Who Needs Democrats?
Ya its just a shame more people dont say something about it. I'm guessing they dont want to be labeled "unpatriotic" or "terrorist".
Originally Posted by pisshead
-
05-08-2005, 04:41 PM #76
Senior Member
With Republicans Like These, Who Needs Democrats?
LOL
Originally Posted by Hydrizzle
-
05-08-2005, 08:04 PM #77
Senior Member
With Republicans Like These, Who Needs Democrats?
Ill have to LMAO at that one too!
-
05-09-2005, 02:23 PM #78
Senior Member
With Republicans Like These, Who Needs Democrats?
me too!
\"even if one takes every reefer madness allegation of the prohibitionists at face value,marijuana prohibition has done far more harm to far more people than marijuana ever could.\"
William F. Buckley Jr.
-
05-09-2005, 06:09 PM #79
Senior Member
With Republicans Like These, Who Needs Democrats?
LMAO ROFL LOL OMG WTF U GOT PWNED! DONT FK WIT DA L33TZ!
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
Democrats vs. Republicans
By KevinFinnerty in forum PoliticsReplies: 12Last Post: 10-16-2007, 07:57 PM -
Democrats and Republicans Agree: Iraq Shall Suffer Occupation in Perpetuum
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 4Last Post: 11-21-2006, 06:31 AM -
DEMOCrats AND REPUBlicans READ HERE
By Doctor mj in forum PoliticsReplies: 5Last Post: 08-16-2006, 02:30 AM -
Republicans
By onwardthroughthefog in forum PoliticsReplies: 0Last Post: 11-10-2005, 04:58 AM -
democrats forced republicans
By eg420ne in forum PoliticsReplies: 4Last Post: 11-02-2005, 07:13 PM








Register To Reply
Staff Online