Results 1 to 10 of 20
Hybrid View
-
07-19-2012, 02:56 AM #1
Senior Member
"Inactive" patients and /or caregivers???/
Wait a minute....I am quick to judge & make assumptions? This conversation was 100% based on opinion? You need to go back and re-read your post. You attacked me without justification or provocation. Many on this forum will tell you that I do not back away from people who post false statements. You did not express your opinion, you attacked. In another post you identify Alfonso as R Greenleaf. R Greenleaf posts under their own name and just because a producer helped establish the NMMCPA (or whatever the initials are), does not mean they "own" it. The patient's alliance is a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) organization. The producers are not. The federal government will never approve a medical cannabis producer or dispensary until the federal law changes.
Originally Posted by DrBreeze
Not all of the producers have public domains. You will not find the Las Cruces producer by googling them. Just because some of the producers do something you don't agree with doesn't mean you should lump all of the LNPPs in the same category. As I said, everyone of them have patients on their boards. Their actions need to be approved by the boards. How many patients do you know serving on the board of a LNPP would allow their company to cheat/gouge the patients? This whole program is built for us patients. Many patients resent the LNPPs mostly because they are misinformed and some because of people like you who come on forums such as this and provide false information. I've read the posts.
IMHO the NM program has a long way to go. But, as long as everyone follows the rules, the program will be here for a while and it doesn't matter which party is in the round house. The rules and regs are in place not only to protect the patients but the LNPPs as well. The feds are staying away and I hope that continues. I for one, do not want to go back to the streets. I prefer the safe access I have with my local producer.
Since you are a caregiver, a Santa Fe property owner, and seem to know it all about cannabis, I haven't seen any of your posts that state you are assisting your parents in growing. If there is a post, I missed it. Growing for them would be the best thing for them. But then, if you did that, you would no longer have any basis to criticize the producers or the program.CFO Reviewed by CFO on . "Inactive" patients and /or caregivers???/ Hello - If you go to the DOH's website, to check the # of total patients, and stats, etc., here: http://nmhealth.org/IDB/medicalcannabis/Medical%20Cannabis%20Numbers%20as%20of%208-29-2011.pdf , there are over a THOUSAND "inactive" patients, and lots of "inactive" caregivers. These make up around 25% of all patients. Wondering, are these people who let their cards lapse? Or, just not participating in the program? Seems odd.... Scared Rating: 5
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
Ri patient looking for CT & RI patients and caregivers
By Lemonaid in forum Rhode Island (RI)Replies: 4Last Post: 02-27-2013, 04:53 AM -
Caregivers w/ less than 5 patients. WHAT DOES 1284 MEAN?
By lampost in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 16Last Post: 07-14-2010, 09:04 PM -
we need patients + caregivers advocacy
By copobo in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 41Last Post: 07-13-2010, 05:10 PM










Register To Reply
Staff Online