Quote Originally Posted by Hydrizzle
I don't think you actually read my post... I asked you what would your criteria be for a country to own or purchase a nuke? Please don't asnwer "no country should have nukes", because that's not realistic.

Also, tell me why you think that the US is liable to use nukes in agression? If that is so true, why didn't we nuke Iraq and Afghanistan? Why don't we just go ahead and nuke N. Korea before they are a real threat? Ill tell you why, because the US isn't like that!!!!

I know you will bring up Japan, but I suggest you backread to my comments about how the nukes actually saved lives in the long run.

Please answer my question.
So are you saying that the US should be the only country to decide who should and shouldn't have nukes??
Do you not believe that using force to make somebody do what you want them to is dictating to them??
I believe the US is the biggest threat to world peace so why not start by nuking them??
Who gave the US the right to decide what is "good" and what is bad ?
Without the interference in other countries America would have no reason to feel threatened , therefore there would be no need for them to have the largest stockpile of WMD in the world.
Why is it OK for the US to have them ?
Protection against enemies??
If thats the case then surely everyone should be able to defend themselves from outside interference. Nukes for everyone ?