Draft U.S. Paper Allows Commanders To Seek Pre-emptive Nuclear Strikes(N.Korea/Iran)

[amsterdam]

and the chinese too,all those chinese made RPG.

amsterdam Reviewed by amsterdam on 05-04-2005. Draft U.S. Paper Allows Commanders To Seek Pre-emptive Nuclear Strikes(N.Korea/Iran) Draft U.S. paper allows commanders to seek preemptive nuke strikes(N. Korea/Iran) Kyodo News ^ | 05/01/05 Posted on 05/01/2005 12:22:02 PM PDT Sunday May 1, 5:39 PM Draft U.S. paper allows commanders to seek preemptive nuke strikes (Kyodo) _ The U.S. military plans to allow regional combatant commanders to request the president for approval to carry out preemptive nuclear strikes against possible attacks on the United States or its allies with weapons of mass destruction, according to Rating: 5

[Funken Monken]

no i know,so what?

again,so we are responsible for the mass murder that regime commited because they had some american made weapons?i guess because everyone in the middle east carries an ak-47 russia is responsible for the crisis?ironic.

Responding to the claim made by another poster.

I'm reading your response and that great phrase "he who is without sin...." keeps crossing my mind....

So what? SO DONT BE SO SURPRISED! You think they were dusting crops with them weapons? Regime needs hardware - 1st supplier, your Govt. OK it was a while back, but the fact remains. And OK so my jibe about 'stamp' clearly went over your head, I forgot...sorry, so I'll specify for you that there is a difference between 'supplying' and 'manufacturing'. I'm not saying your government manufactured them.

[amsterdam]

yep it was over my head.lol.its just that your accusation is sooooooo tired.its like reading the new york times.

so we supplied the weapons 25 years ago,our fault?france sold them anti tank missles a week before we went in,china sold them guns for the past 40 years as did russia.

so that means that because we supplied them with guns 25 years ago,we are responsibe for what they did with them.

that even sounds silly.

[Hydrizzle]

Funken, if you want to bring up what our countries did in the past to fuck up the world, the US has NOTHING on Britain. They fucked up so many damn countries with thier colonialism, it isn't even funny. Oh, and your incorrect about Iraq having US-made weapons; they have Russian and Chinese-made weapons. I don't see any M-4's, I see Kalishnakovs. I don't see American tanks or planes, I see Russian migs and PT-76's.... Maybe your thining of the Taliban, which we did supply, then they betrayed us.

BTW, Funken your "facts" about Bush being innarticualte and can't run a business, are actually opinions.
Just to define:

Fact: something that can be proven right or wrong with physical data.

Opinion: Something that CANNOT be proven right or wrong with physical data.

[GHoSToKeR]

Of course an opinion can be proven...

[Hydrizzle]

The definition of an opinion is that it cannot be proven...

[GHoSToKeR]

"Opinion:

a personal belief or judgment that is not founded on proof or certainty."

An opinion is a personal belief or judgement, like this definition says... It isn't based on fact or truth, but it can still be proven.. If I said "It is my opinion that there are at least three white people in America" you could go out and prove it.

[Hydrizzle]

Well, that's not an opinion, thats a fact! An opinion would be: the best ice cream is vanilla. A fact would be: vanilla ice cream is white

opinion: Rainy weather is bad.
fact: it's raining outside!

opinion: Pulp Fiction is the best movie
fact: Pulp Fiction was directed by Quentin Tarantino

see where i'm getting here?

[GHoSToKeR]

Okay, yeah, I get it..

But Bush did fail at business... And he is damn sure inarticulate.. You only have to listen to him to see that. So saying that he is inarticulate and can't run a business would be a fact, not an opinion.

[Hydrizzle]

Sure, I agree. My opinion is the same as your. However, just because he is inarticulate and a bad businessman does not make him the devil.