Draft U.S. Paper Allows Commanders To Seek Pre-emptive Nuclear Strikes(N.Korea/Iran)

[nuance]

while i dont agree with a preemptive nuke strike,i will say that nuclear weapons today are much different today than 50 years ago.you dont have to level an entire city.you can tacticaly nuke part of it.

Yea but knowing USA, you'd drop 60 megatonnes to take out a bunker. Surely there are other weapons that are able to take out a part of a city without causing a fallout.

nuance Reviewed by nuance on 05-02-2005. Draft U.S. Paper Allows Commanders To Seek Pre-emptive Nuclear Strikes(N.Korea/Iran) Draft U.S. paper allows commanders to seek preemptive nuke strikes(N. Korea/Iran) Kyodo News ^ | 05/01/05 Posted on 05/01/2005 12:22:02 PM PDT Sunday May 1, 5:39 PM Draft U.S. paper allows commanders to seek preemptive nuke strikes (Kyodo) _ The U.S. military plans to allow regional combatant commanders to request the president for approval to carry out preemptive nuclear strikes against possible attacks on the United States or its allies with weapons of mass destruction, according to Rating: 5

[amsterdam]

a neutron bomb,it only kills people and leaves the buildings intact.pretty cool stuff.

[F L E S H]

Yes, let's bomb the motherfuckers! I think they haven't suffered enough. I think the first step towrds freeing the North Koreans should be to kill half of them in a horrible death known as nuclear holocaust, then they will love America and happily help us get rid of Kim Jong Il. Then we'll open up a McDonald's in Pyongyang and everything will be in its right place.

America, Fuck Yeah!

[amsterdam]

Yes, let's bomb the motherfuckers! I think they haven't suffered enough. I think the first step towrds freeing the North Koreans should be to kill half of them in a horrible death known as nuclear holocaust, then they will love America and happily help us get rid of Kim Jong Il. Then we'll open up a McDonald's in Pyongyang and everything will be in its right place.

America, Fuck Yeah!

north korea aint shit.there leaders are pee-ons and all they can do is shoot missles into the sea of japan,scary.let them starve themselves to death.

why even waste a bomb on them.

[Hydrizzle]

Yeah, but what's to stop them from smuggling a nuke in on a boat or plane and detonating it in San Francisco bay harbor? Sounds feasable to me. I think the idea of pre-emptive strikes is good against these tyrannical dictators and despots. Something needs to be done to keep the Kim-Jong-Ill's in check. If threats of nuclear bombs is all he understands, then so be it.

[nuance]

Bush = a tyrannical dictator. How about a pre-emptive nuke strike on Washington? No wait. He's a corporate puppet. There's a difference. Got to remember that one.

[GHoSToKeR]

Seriously, i'm speechless..

[amsterdam]

Yeah, but what's to stop them from smuggling a nuke in on a boat or plane and detonating it in San Francisco bay harbor? Sounds feasable to me. I think the idea of pre-emptive strikes is good against these tyrannical dictators and despots. Something needs to be done to keep the Kim-Jong-Ill's in check. If threats of nuclear bombs is all he understands, then so be it.

i agree,but that guy is a pussy.no one gives ashit about him and thats why he is always trying to flex his small muscles.

[Hydrizzle]

A pussy with a nuke is quite dangerous. This pussy could be used by other powers to attack the US or Japan (China...).

Nuance, I would love to hear some FACTS on how bush is a "tyrannical dictator". Dictator=absolute power, which he doesnt have, because this is a democracy. If you want to know about tyrannical dictators, why don't you get your facts straight and read up about Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Saddam, Tojo, Hugo Chavez, etc, etc, etc...

All the Bush bashers really have no cognitive arguments against him... just vague comments about how he murders civilians and get money for himself, help the Saudis, blah blah blah Michael Moore said so blah blah blah.

[amsterdam]

A pussy with a nuke is quite dangerous. This pussy could be used by other powers to attack the US or Japan (China...).

Nuance, I would love to hear some FACTS on how bush is a "tyrannical dictator". Dictator=absolute power, which he doesnt have, because this is a democracy. If you want to know about tyrannical dictators, why don't you get your facts straight and read up about Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Saddam, Tojo, Hugo Chavez, etc, etc, etc...

All the Bush bashers really have no cognitive arguments against him... just vague comments about how he murders civilians and get money for himself, help the Saudis, blah blah blah Michael Moore said so blah blah blah.

you are my new hero!

be careful though,some people around here are RABID!