Most CA dispensaries are better than going to an OTC Pharmacy for a prescription. First the pharmacy will always make you wait. Ostensibly so you will wander around the store and purchase items that you otherwise would not have had they just given you your prescription and let you go. You also have to hang with folks or numerous contagious illnesses at the pharmacy while most of the patients at the dispensaries are there for non contagious medical conditions. I would rather go to any CA dispensary for my medicine than any CA pharmacy.

Note to Denver Relief. What happens if your patient goes to Hemp Con and signs with another provider for a free 1/8 without notifying you. You can get in big trouble. You model still needs to address some flaws the same as the CA model. The local laws are doubly messed up. In San Jose they allowed just 10dispensaries for a city of approx 1 million. The dispensaries also have to grow all the weed they sell on the premises. This would take a warehouse size operation for each dispensary which would then put all the "legal" dispensaries in violation of federal law. The existing dispensaries are all technically illegal yet they are all required to pay taxes on their sales.
rudy2010 Reviewed by rudy2010 on . anyone know why the "california model" seems to be the dominant method of dispensing? Just curious as to why patients are so prone to walk onto a facility that not only fails to keep their identity private but somehow manages to make it seem more like a taco truck than a medical office? Any feedback or info would be greatly appreciated. It just seems to me that it's a high overhead, poor solution for patients and enduces the ever present media magnet rather than keeping it discreet. Rating: 5