Results 21 to 28 of 28
-
04-16-2011, 03:41 PM #21Junior Member
Why is there no REAL discussion of 5073?!
This bill failed GG refused to sign it......... this was the most blatant violation of my rights I had ever read.....
did they plan to make every person who is prescribed Oxycontin register with the DOH and have their info given to god knows who because its a controlled substance.. ????
under Federal law I am not required to divulge my medical history to any government agency.... its a violation of my right to privacy.. because you know the police would have full access to the lists... users and growers...
-
04-16-2011, 03:47 PM #22Junior Member
Why is there no REAL discussion of 5073?!
Where is too far south. I offer electrical services all over western wa. state and would be happy to help any mm patient with there electrical needs. My prices are fair and after I'm done you won't have to worry about the electrical safety of your home. go check out my websites HI AMP ELECTRIC Serving Western Washington...Get a free quote or Medical Marijuana in Washington State...Links and Info
Originally Posted by david98686
-
04-16-2011, 05:12 PM #23Senior Member
Why is there no REAL discussion of 5073?!
Originally Posted by nwredneck
The bad thing is that the feds just got permission to help local police bust every dispensary they want and we don't have a governor with the guts to say hands off.
-
04-17-2011, 05:30 PM #24Member
Why is there no REAL discussion of 5073?!
They could have drafted a good bill that could have protected us patients.
Read the 'discussion' over at Toke of The Town just for fun: Group: Washington Gov. Gregoire 'A Liar' About Dispensaries - Toke of the Town
-
04-17-2011, 07:50 PM #25Senior Member
Why is there no REAL discussion of 5073?!
A lot of the basis for the law was written by a small group of dispensary owners that thought they could capitalize on a properly written law. Thats how all laws are written. And all of these also goes to the fact that no legislature or congress has the legal authority to legalize or outlaw a natural growing plant. But they do it anyway as they do with so many things. They do it because there's nothing to fear, your government does not fear, you the people. We are going to need to reintroduce fear of the people back into the equation.
-
04-18-2011, 02:01 PM #26Senior Member
Why is there no REAL discussion of 5073?!
Originally Posted by killerweed420
And we never failed to fail...it was the easiest thing to do.
-
05-05-2011, 03:17 PM #27Senior Member
Why is there no REAL discussion of 5073?!
I was looking for a copy of SB5073 as it was signed but can't find it yet. But back to discussion...I think these Reps nned to be remembered at Election time....
By Senators Sheldon, Hargrove, Becker, Stevens
These guys need to go....Seems like a good time to start a list of people that need to no longer be Elected.
5073-S2.E AMS SHEL BUCK 448 Official Print - 1
5073-S2.E AMS SHEL BUCK 448
E2SSB 5073 - S AMD TO H COMM AMD (H2509.E) 394
By Senators Sheldon, Hargrove, Becker, Stevens
OUT OF ORDER 04/21/2011
On page 37, beginning on line 4 of the amendment, after
"dispensers" strike all material through "dispensers" on line 8 and
insert ". Cities and towns may absolutely ban licensed dispensers from
within their jurisdictions"
On page 37, beginning on line 15 of the amendment, after
"dispensers" strike all material through "dispensers" on line 19 and
insert ". Counties may absolutely ban licensed dispensers from within
their jurisdictionsâ?ť
EFFECT: Cities, towns, and counties may absolutely ban
licensed dispensers from within their jurisdictions.
And McCune thinks you have to be 21 to be sick....
5073-S2.E AMH MCCU MORI 077
E2SSB 5073 - H AMD TO WAYS COMM AMD (H-2509.2/11) 608
By Representative McCune
WITHDRAWN 04/11/2011
On page 7, line 15 of the striking amendment, after "(a)(i)"
insert "Is twenty-one years of age or older;
(ii)"
Renumber the remaining subsections consecutively and correct any
internal references accordingly.
EFFECT: Requires a person to be twenty-one years of age or
older to be a qualifying patient; i.e., a person eligible to use
medical cannabis.And we never failed to fail...it was the easiest thing to do.
-
05-05-2011, 05:08 PM #28Senior Member
Why is there no REAL discussion of 5073?!
I usually vote for Sheldon because he's an independent, but I will be voting against him in the next election.
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
SB 5073 Passed, sent to the Govenorfor signing!
By david98686 in forum Washington (WA)Replies: 15Last Post: 05-10-2011, 09:27 PM -
SB 5073 Won't Matter
By killerweed420 in forum Washington (WA)Replies: 5Last Post: 04-17-2011, 07:45 PM -
Looks like 5073 Dead.
By hiamps in forum Washington (WA)Replies: 1Last Post: 04-16-2011, 03:45 PM -
SB 5073
By DankDragon in forum Washington (WA)Replies: 0Last Post: 04-13-2011, 10:26 PM -
What don't you like in SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5073
By hiamps in forum Washington (WA)Replies: 7Last Post: 03-30-2011, 03:39 AM