Results 11 to 20 of 23
-
03-18-2011, 04:55 PM #11
Senior Member
HERE WE GO AGAIN
It is a fact that Montana dispensaries got raided.
Originally Posted by DenverRelief
It is not a RUMOR. (in best schwarzenegger voice)
-
03-18-2011, 04:58 PM #12
Senior Member
HERE WE GO AGAIN
And to think patients are just going to be okay with being videotaped and the transaction history being made a part of some database.
-
03-18-2011, 05:01 PM #13
Senior Member
HERE WE GO AGAIN
Yes, they did get raided in Montana, but not ALL dispensaries.
Originally Posted by canaguy27
The rumor is that they are going to come after Colorado, and as the article above states, we have a stronger legal defense against federal prosecution from Amend20.Home of Bio-Diesel - 2009 Medical Marijuana Harvest Cup Winner
[COLOR=\"#006400\"]Menus | Strains, Edibles, Concentrates
Wellness Services
Read Reviews
Location & Hours[/COLOR]
-
03-18-2011, 05:04 PM #14
Senior Member
HERE WE GO AGAIN
The video-taping has not passed and will likely be removed from HB11-1043 before it does.
Every time you buy groceries at Safeway and enter your phone-number, your purchase goes into a database.
There is no central database in place collecting every patients' sale.Home of Bio-Diesel - 2009 Medical Marijuana Harvest Cup Winner
[COLOR=\"#006400\"]Menus | Strains, Edibles, Concentrates
Wellness Services
Read Reviews
Location & Hours[/COLOR]
-
03-18-2011, 05:19 PM #15
Senior Member
HERE WE GO AGAIN
MMC's don't have any rights under A20, unfortunately. Our legal protection is derived from HB1284. They also let everyone at MMBA know last night that the transactions won't be recorded. If you guys get a chance, you should check out one of their monthly meetings! Always informative.
Originally Posted by DenverRelief
-
03-18-2011, 05:35 PM #16
Senior Member
HERE WE GO AGAIN
The DEA had evidence the Montana dispensaries were involved in trafficking:
Montana medical marijuana stores raided; advocates cry foul - CNN
It was an 18 month long investigation, so this is NOT a result of a change of policy.
Quoting from the CNN article:
" Individuals who are in compliance with state law are not the focus of the investigation, authorities said."
So what's changed?
-
03-18-2011, 05:44 PM #17
Senior Member
HERE WE GO AGAIN
We'll see. Maybe these raids are an isolated incident, like The Bartkowicz Affairâ?¢. Maybe not.
-
03-18-2011, 05:52 PM #18
Senior Member
HERE WE GO AGAIN
I agree, it's hard to tell.
Originally Posted by HighPopalorum
Also, read the actual Haag Memo... http://www.cannabistherapyinstitute.....haag.memo.pdf
It was directed to Oakland, specifically their plan to have extremely large scale grows. Does it apply to CO? I don't know.
-
03-18-2011, 06:11 PM #19
Senior Member
HERE WE GO AGAIN
Also, Haag is the US Attorney for the northern district of CA, not the entire USA.
-
03-18-2011, 06:23 PM #20
Senior Member
HERE WE GO AGAIN
The difference is:
Originally Posted by DenverRelief
1. Buying groceries is not illegal on a Federal level and local police do not harass grocery purchasers.
2. You enter your phone number by choice, you are not forced to.








Register To Reply
Staff Online