Quote Originally Posted by WashougalWonder
Nope never tried the other stuff. Just molasses and now the BB. I do not give molasses during the bloombastic feeding weeks.
I was just comparing the bloombastic with the FF late flowering nute line.

Bloombastic 0-14-15
FF Cha-Ching 9-50-10

but looking at the total load I am giving my flowers at 5+ weeks, the total NPK is closer to this:
Tiger Bloom 2 - 8 - 4
Big Bloom .1- .3- .7 (mostly organics)
Cha-Ching 9 -50- 10
================
My Total NPK 11.1-58.3-14.7

Yours:
Big Bloom .1-.3-.7
Bloombastic 0-14-15
=======================
Your Total NPK .1-14.3-15.7


So there you have it. We are giving about the same potassium and I am giving 400% more phosphorus, according to FF, for oil production as well as some Nitrogen. Reading the documentation I see that this heavy P load may extend the flowering period. I wonder by how much, but I also have to think that it would be worth it if I am adding that much oil weight.

It amazes me just how different the various nutrient brands of nutrients are from each other. I will have to do a study on just what the recommended levels of the leading brands are throughout the typical 13 week cycle. Looking at these numbers may help decide which brand is better at each stage, or who has all the numbers optimized better for growing weeds. I am sure that they would all claim that using their product suite as suggested will produce superior crops, but with so much diversity out there, I wonder if any of them really do have this all dialed in correctly. And then to add to the confusion, products such as this Bloombastic, Superthrive and others claim that vitamin levels and trace minerals are the key factors for a good crop. This is fascinating!

Emmie