Quote Originally Posted by Colodonmed
No offense man, but maybe you should read a little more on the proposal because this is not good for you or I or any of the 100,000 plus registered patients
I may well be wrong, but I thought that rule has been precluded by the announcement Releaf just posted. The fact the DoR is holding meetings with patients indicates that perhaps the draft rules are under ongoing review, which is what one does with drafts, after all. I have no idea what we're even arguing about since we both agree that recording patient transactions and conversations is a bad idea. Peace out.

:hippy:

P.S. I haven't read the draft rules and never will. I like reading legislation because I have a personal and professional interest in civics, but the day I find myself reading draft regulations it might be time to consider suicide. I will rely entirely on you knuckleheads!
HighPopalorum Reviewed by HighPopalorum on . Violating Patient Rights Discussion regarding the notion that patient rights are being violated by the DOR cameras and possible database system. ================================= After driving to Denver to attend the MMBA meeting tonight, there is continued information that the DOR is not interested in violating patient rights. "They don't even want to see patient information" was clearly stated more than once. The statement made by Dan Hartman regarding cameras was that the only DOR monitored camera would be Rating: 5