It's bad science and the 5 nano-gram number just came from thin air as basically admitted by Levy in Nederland on Tuesday at the town board meeting where she discussed all the bills she has introduced except 1261, which she left out of her presentation until questioned by a physician and Kathleen (keeping em honest).
She admitted she had no science behind her bill and she did it to stimulate debate about the subject is what she said.

From what I am told the Physician pointed out what I believe. and that is she has just set up a system to ruin many lives from teenagers to the elderly but unjustly charging them for DUID. Costing our States citizens thousands to defend a bogus charge because of another bad law we do not need. The present laws work just fine and we dont need our State Representatives writing laws to stimulate debate, how fucked up is that? Where's the problem Claire? you forgot to call the local news crews 1st to stir things up with horror stories of the horrors of driving on Cannabis even days after using it. while many of your colleges pop their Diazepam before their rush hour drive.
:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:
GratefulMeds Reviewed by GratefulMeds on . And here it is...HB11-1261 - the THC Level DUI Bill This is the first sentence of the bill: "The bill allows a person who drives with a tetrahydrocannabinols (THC) blood content of 5 nanograms or more to be charged with DUI per se." Considering the information about THC and driving out there, and the lack of a problem with drivers using cannabis, this surprises me. How did they determine the 5 nanogram benchmark? Rating: 5