If people want to stay on the right side of the law, they should consider not driving at all when high. I know that can be inconvenient, but it isn't unreasonable. Rather than trying to determine exactly how much or little cannabis you can consume and remain under the legal limit, choose not to get behind the wheel. My advice w/r/t alcohol and other drugs is identical.

As for the per se standard, I think it would be a great idea for drivers under 21. I'm not opposed to a universal standard in principle, but I question whether it is needed. I would welcome increased police efforts to stop and arrest high drivers, with or without this bill.
HighPopalorum Reviewed by HighPopalorum on . And here it is...HB11-1261 - the THC Level DUI Bill This is the first sentence of the bill: "The bill allows a person who drives with a tetrahydrocannabinols (THC) blood content of 5 nanograms or more to be charged with DUI per se." Considering the information about THC and driving out there, and the lack of a problem with drivers using cannabis, this surprises me. How did they determine the 5 nanogram benchmark? Rating: 5