Quote Originally Posted by senorx 12562
You're obviously way smarter than me, or you have way better drugs, because I don't even understand your syntax, let alone your misuse of legal precedent that has no precedential value in the context in which you seek to apply it. Saying I don't understand you is not bashing you. It's just that you seem to be speaking Chinese.
WAG THE DOG.... 100% political Dumbo jumbo.. has nothing to do with precedential value at all...i,e, CHINESE.

Now if you go to the legal case law, you can clearly see the Chinese our government is using... one must understand Chinese in order to decipher the case law our courts are using...

If you think I am incorrect, please post the correct legal case law which does apply to what these yahoos are doing... since my drugs are better.

I do not claim to be smarter then you at all... I just understand their lingo they are using and why they are using it... to speak to the public in CHINESE...

If we get invaded by china, who is going to pay for our defense?? Since we are in debt with china to the tune of ?? Oh, our country is "finacially" supported 100% by china... try figuring that political fuck-up out...