Results 51 to 57 of 57
-
02-16-2011, 05:02 PM #51Senior Member
1043 amendment torn up?
Originally Posted by TheReleafCenter
-
02-16-2011, 06:26 PM #52Senior Member
1043 amendment torn up?
I'm hesitant to respond because you're nuts and because it is off-topic, but has it ever occurred to you that we might want retail marijuana sales in Colorado? I'm not knocking the program in Oregon; I believe strongly each state should set their own marijuana policies, but I personally prefer marijuana be regulated and sold openly at retail like any other commodity. Our program serves a lot more patients and our patients have a lot more selection. An adoption of the Oregon model would be a retrograde movement for patients and activists, and shutting down the hundreds of MMCs in the state would be foolish at any time, particularly during this period of economic recovery.
-
02-16-2011, 06:45 PM #53OPSenior Member
1043 amendment torn up?
Originally Posted by HighPopalorum
Damn it It just rubbs me wrong to agree with you.
But when your right your right :wtf:\"If you don\'t read the newspaper you are uninformed; if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed.\" - Mark Twain
-
02-17-2011, 02:11 AM #54Senior Member
1043 amendment torn up?
I am in favor of dispensaries, but I worry about new users who might go there and get bad quality, and not get the full benefits of the plant. Then they might turn to harder drugs and alcohol.
-
02-17-2011, 03:22 AM #55Senior Member
1043 amendment torn up?
Originally Posted by HighPopalorum
-
02-17-2011, 01:00 PM #56Senior Member
1043 amendment torn up?
Originally Posted by HighPopalorum
Provider model is the public retail model.. the caregiver model restrains this to 1 patient at any one time... get it now.?? If not, maybe you should look a little deeper into it... not that you would be considered to be nuts or off topic at all.. you would be right on point.
An adoption of the Oregon program is a not the answer either, nor would I push it as one. Their constitution is respected by the majority.
I am in Washington state... the state next to Oregon.. I am not o.k. with what our legislature is doing at all.. restraint of a 1st amendment right under a schedule 1 drug is unconstitutional and is a direct violation of Conant v. Walters injunction... call me nuts but, it seems our mmj state reps think it is o.k. to use the Wa. D.C. case of pearson (since it was a state case only, not federal like conant v. walters) States rights under a schedule 1 drug to say that recommendations operate as a prescriptive devise..
Montana legislature just voted to repeal their mmj laws.. look at the BIG mmj picture please, not just your state.. this is a big huge push across the U.S.not just your state.
-
02-17-2011, 01:05 PM #57Senior Member
1043 amendment torn up?
Originally Posted by MtnLionCO
The governments claims of doing things in the names of our children is a farce. They use our children as pawns for money... if our kids are so important to them, our schools would be top notch in the world for the amount of money they use our kids for...
So ya, what about the kids !!! Why leave them out of using cannabis?? Wa. laws don't.
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
Good turnout of MMJ advocates today on 1043
By shackhouser in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 1Last Post: 02-11-2011, 05:19 PM -
MMC's testifying in support of HB 11-1043??
By shackhouser in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 3Last Post: 02-11-2011, 05:10 PM -
New Legislation: HB 11-1043
By copobo in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 19Last Post: 01-23-2011, 01:45 AM -
I'm so torn...
By iwantFUEGO in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 27Last Post: 02-10-2007, 05:07 PM -
Another family torn apart!
By Storm Crow in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 3Last Post: 04-04-2006, 10:13 PM