Quote Originally Posted by gypski
I heard about the amendments, and I posted this because it was Devlin and his language. As I said, I agree with what I highlighted. As you point out, I say no fucking way big time. Go fuck yourself who ever came up with that idea of every 90 days. When I was a heavy drinker, no one tried to keep me for the booze like they to the far less harmful cannabis.

And they sure did take my money when I did something stupid under the influence of alcohol. So I'm with you on the amendments, they are really there to kill the bill. But, maybe they can be stripped before the final vote. That sometimes happens from reconciliation of a House an Senate bill for final passage. I don't want more legalese bullshit mumbo-jumbo maze crap, just common sense legislation that restores individual rights an freedoms to medical treatment and medications. :thumbsup:
Thanks man, I thought you were on the good side!
Either strike them or dump the bill. We will never win with antique old repulicans in office like Mike Crennel. Ugg
iceshark Reviewed by iceshark on . One committee cleared I the bill passed with what is stated in bold italic, I'm all for it. Now that my real name has been outted, I'd even sign up for the registry. All I've ever done while I've had my authorization is to stay within the parameters of the law with dried and life plants. But, if it clears then next committee, and become law with language reflecting what the bold italic says, please make it active immediately for those out of the grist mill and let those cases in the mill proceed to final outcome Rating: 5