Quote Originally Posted by NaturalScience
If I'm a heart patient with heart medicine by a California doctor, and yet I've packed more pills into one container for my limited travel, as well as for its life saving convenience, no public court of opinion will convict me for being overly cautious about my health. If one has significant documentation that should be enough to travel anywhere without being detained or acted upon with any degree of prejudice.

The court of public opinion:
U.S. eases stance on medical marijuana
The court of public opinion applies in the public, not the courts... public opinion is political arena domain only... not the courts..

Many court cases have dealt with this on more than one occasion.

PUBLIC OPINION IS A LEGISLATIVE MATTER..their arena. not the courts.

Easing the stance means exactly that... laws so you can claim an AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE TO CRIMINAL CHARGES..mostly for a non-mens rea law.. meaning no intent is to be accounted for.. you possess the cannabis, you are automatically guilty of the charged criminal offense. NO EXCEPTION ALLOWED.. JUST LIKE IN FEDERAL COURT.. NO MEDICAL NECESSITY DEFENSE.

So educating one's self in the PROPER way of the laws.. and not the laws of public opinion or the laws of man's own mind *uck would behoove one greatly..

Thinking anything else just makes it worse on one's mind...

I have posted a FREE LAW LIBRARY SO ONE CAN EDUCATE THEMSELVES.. anything less is just an injustice... because ignorance of the law is no excuse...and any lawyer will tell you the same thing... maybe not so bluntly but, the same message will be conveyed.

We as a society must ban together and work this out.. we know they are not going to assist in taking food off the table of the officers of the court..but, just the opposite.