Hope I am not intruding/interrupting here but, i noticed something very interesting here with the language and just thought to shed some light of what is really going on here..

Notice the hook here in this language..?

DIAGNOSED BY THE PERSON'S
3 PHYSICIAN IN THE COURSE OF A BONA FIDE PHYSICIAN-PATIENT
4 RELATIONSHIP AND FOR WHICH THE PHYSICIAN HAS RECOMMENDED

5 THE USE OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA

The Michigan appeals court used this specific lingo to point out public policy of what constitutes a VALID relationship vs. for profit clinics... THCF was the clinic in which the court ruled their is/was not a ''Bona Fide Physician-Patient Relationship" with Dr. Eisenbud... http://coa.courts.mi.gov/documents/O...295809.OPN.PDF

It would appear this lingo would cut out about 3/4 of the signing clinics which are not owned and operated by a learned professional..i.e. healthcare professional owned business per public policy... Most mmj clinics are not owned or operated by licensed professionals... a flawed business plan against public policy. Laypersons are at the helm..which does not conform to any written public policy.

The target goal of our government is to slow/stop the growth of the exploded industry. By hook or by crook.

This is the lingo that must be changed if your state wants to survive the attack... our government is on a roll at any cost to stop growth.. the case above shows us this fact... a new frontal assault.