Quote Originally Posted by oldhaole
I call bullshit.

If LEO "Helps you out" or facilitates part of a grow op like you state, any first year law student can beat those charges.

It's called entrapment and LEO is just not that stupid.
Entrapment by Estoppel is the defense to be exact. State v. Leavitt. [wa. case div.II]. Federal defense it is Cox. v. Louisiana.

But, sounds like maybe it is a ruse tango is speaking about...since caregiver is not a wa. state term of art used any longer, it is provider..and a provider would be the one committing the crime of distribution under state/fed laws..so this does not make any sense..a patient would only be in possession with intent to use the substance...and nothing more since the contract specifically is for that intent by law..

Go figure.