Quote Originally Posted by gypski
Like many others in the community Doug Hiatt has his detractors and supporters. I tend to see overall holistically, he's got the right think in his heart and mind. And he just may not agree with someone else's interpretation of the laws.

Me I've always gone by and stood by the laws were unconstitutional in the first place, regardless of what a court, any court may say. Frankly, that's my right to be civilly disobedient, even if the consequence may result in incarceration or worse. And, I've taken nearly all they have dished out so far. Wore me down, but I'm still standing the same line!!!
I guess the interpretation of our mmj laws are we are criminals because we use an authorized legislated substance...

Our AFF. DEF. is the same as an AFF. DEF. of assaulting another human being... VIOLENCE. AT NO POINT IN ANY TIME IS IT AUTHORIZED TO ASSAULT ANY HUMAN BEING...WITH VIOLENCE.

This means that no-patient is allowed to enter the USE of their medicine until a finder of fact allows you to use this substance...

This is not our law we voted in... this is a law these CLUB members came up with by design to cheat the public out of honest services.. BOTTOM LINE HERE GUY !!!

Our mmj law is actually just like the trespass statute AFF. DEF. in reality... either you have permission or you don't to be at a place you are...i.e. WHO THE HELL AUTHORIZES YOUR USE ??? CERTAINLY NO FINDER OF FACT SIGNED YOUR AUTHORIZATION... THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY AUTHORITY TO ALLOW YOU TO USE... THEY ARE NOT LICENSED UNDER HEALTHCARE LAWS TO DO SO...

GET IT YET??