Our Affirmative Defense is not equal to self defense

[jamessr]

I have been doing some deep research into how this theory of our affirmative defense being equal to a self defense affirmative defense came about and how does it really match up in analyzing defenses to criminal charges.

What I can up with was incredible...our government and lawyers of wa. have duped us big time for profit controverting the rules of evidence against us laypersons of society...lawyer's in wa. get disbarred for bucking the extortionist.

So the correct legal theory analysis of any lawyer with due diligence is the criminal trespass affirmative defense...you have permission to enter or not[ i.e. your dr. signed your authorization to use cannabis in wa. state exclusively for the patient]...by an authorized person[ i.e. only a dr. licensed in wa. may prescribe marijuana, see state v. tracy en banc]. And it is located in the statute itself as were the self defense is not but, located in the general section of defenses against criminal charges] has no permission to assault only defend against attack. No patient has any intent to cause harm nor defend against another human being.

Now this is a big problem for those whom have been convicted on the wrong legal theory by our judicial system..i.e. officers of the court to defraud we the people like that.

Not to mention possession is not a strict liability crime since 1998 enactment of rcw 69.51A et. seq. as one has to have knowledge with a medical recommendation.

jamessr Reviewed by jamessr on 01-16-2011. Our Affirmative Defense is not equal to self defense I have been doing some deep research into how this theory of our affirmative defense being equal to a self defense affirmative defense came about and how does it really match up in analyzing defenses to criminal charges. What I can up with was incredible...our government and lawyers of wa. have duped us big time for profit controverting the rules of evidence against us laypersons of society...lawyer's in wa. get disbarred for bucking the extortionist. So the correct legal theory Rating: 5

[time4me]

Class-action lawsuit for interfering with our right to obtain medical treatment, especially in regards to pain, which is a patient right by federal law.
As for registering with the state, BS! Look at what they feds are trying to do in MI.
F*** it, we need a new government!

[jamessr]

Class-action lawsuit for interfering with our right to obtain medical treatment, especially in regards to pain, which is a patient right by federal law.
As for registering with the state, BS! Look at what they feds are trying to do in MI.
F*** it, we need a new government!

It is deeper than you realize time...of the issues going on in MI...a pattern has emerged it's ugly head with A certain political group involved...it happened in oregon and washington just the same way. hint hint.