It's o.k. time. We are all feeling the same.. sick and damn tired of being subjected to personal predilections and controverting our rights into non legislated crimes for profit under the CSA. As you see from the proposed legislation for patient protections listed, our legislators are damn tired of it also... note the intent located at rcw 69.51A.005, Now look up on-line in google, elements of hobbs act violation, elements of mail fraud, elements of wire fraud, elements of theft of honest services...both state and federal...

The political arena is getting hot and spicy. Our state legislators are answering the call just like congress did in U.S. v. McNally[ theft of honest service case]...making it clear as a bell.!! no ambiguity of what a crime is and is not..EVIDENCE and they changed what constitutes this expressed evidence. and as the court in state v. fry noted, presentment requirement is not triggered until charged...not when contacted by leo,

So as you see, the "prior" court rulings do not now match the proposed legislation. As an aff. def. is now different as applied and to whom and for what reasons. No arrest legally translates into it is no longer a public offense which give rise to any discretion by the prior offending government agents. As long as one is within 15/24 floor, ceiling is what your doctor says it is under due diligence of their professional medical opinion in regards to mitigating your symptoms[notice the section missing in each condition category[unreleived by standard treatment and meds] this was removed because patient are being denied medical treatment thru DOC, which is illegal as all hell, smart to fix the issue before getting sued for millions, see dignity of death act and court cases,, and of coarse this is at the juncture which the aff. def/medical necessity def. per mmj wac. comes into play as a backdrop protection to have a jury of your peers decide if you had to much...not many jurors I know of whom practice medicine for a living, see my point?

As for that judge you mentioned, they are in each and every county as a "gatekeeper" for the state policing interest, every person whom enters will for sure lose and get a lashing.

A specific judge in the county I live in said these exact words to me in court on the record: What is it with you people?? He was responding to me asking him WTF was his issue with me having my 35 plants retrieved from my home he decided I didn't have a right to be at anymore.. he was trying to put me in jail for violating a court order because my neighbor wrote an affidavit identifying first and last name...well the problem was, I have 2 boys with my same 1st and last name, it was one of my boys which was here, not me..anyhow, I know the spiel really well and it is these types of judges which need to be stopped from their criminal behavior against society.