Results 1 to 10 of 88
Hybrid View
-
01-12-2011, 01:44 AM #1OPSenior Member
Legislative Bills
Here are the links to the Senate and House bills. Whether we fully agree or not, its what we may get. :smokin:
SB 5073 - 2011-12
HB 1100 - 2011-12gypski Reviewed by gypski on . Legislative Bills Here are the links to the Senate and House bills. Whether we fully agree or not, its what we may get. :smokin: SB 5073 - 2011-12 HB 1100 - 2011-12 Rating: 5
-
01-12-2011, 07:52 AM #2Member
Legislative Bills
Wow, thanks, Gypski. It's the same bill, house and senate. I think you are right.
-
01-13-2011, 01:53 PM #3Senior Member
Legislative Bills
Now that's what I call legislation for us all. I like the section which reaches into the very pockets of violators, that will stop the theft of honest services right fast.
The section for the research program is awesome...
The pre-emption section addresses needed attention.
Interesting registration program...I see many flaws that will be abused...look at what is going on in mich. state registry system and collectives protected like oregon registry system..the feds want records from the state registry system which is protected by state law. Most feds would pay the penalty [ for a state official/officer ] to get the records.:wtf:
Looks like SOW has gotten the picture finally and about time.:thumbsup:
-
01-13-2011, 05:20 PM #4justpics
Legislative Bills
I don't like the standard of "some evidence" that gives police a loophole around protection from arrest. That's the same standard of evidence we give to prison inmates accused of crimes inside of prison.
What is "evidence" that a patient has been a provider to more than 1 patient in 15 days? What is "evidence" that a patient has benefit from a patient provider relationship? Sounds like anything a kidnap err kitsap county officer says it is. ie: no protection from arrest unless the officer wants to give it to you, which is the SAME THING WE CURRENTLY HAVE. How many patients in king county have been arrested under the current law?
Get rid of the loopholes and add some teeth.
The patient registry is a disaster, but its not like we all didn't see it coming. ACLU has been working on that one for a long time.
The DUI section is a disaster too, if per se limits come into play, any time a patient is pulled over they will be at risk for a DUI.
That plus patient registry = nightmare.
Advertisements
01-13-2011, 07:17 PM
#5

Member
Legislative Bills
Yeah, the part about transplants is just a slap in the face for those of us who need transplants. They might as well left it out. By leaving it in, it just tells me that no one in the system gives a sh*t and here, let's rub it in your face!
01-13-2011, 08:01 PM
#6

Senior Member
Legislative Bills
Guess we need to fix this part then don't we.Originally Posted by time4me
![]()
01-13-2011, 10:13 PM
#7

OP
Senior Member
Legislative Bills
I've been reading the buzz (no pun intended) in other Washington State forums concerning the new law, and what is missing with these two bills, is another bill being introduced. That bill concerns impaired driving and the level that the bill is trying to set is outrageous. The fuckers give in one hand, and try and backdoor us with the other. Does anyone really expect honest services from these schiesters? Do you really feel as though your concerns are being represented? Or do you feel like a pawn in a bullshit game of hide the pea with the illusion of personal freedom and choice where it concerns life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (fucking freedom from pain and trying to live a normal fucking life)? :cursing: :twocents:
Its not surprising people get guns and shoot politicians and other members of the system because they are such lying fucks who prey on their own constituents and those they are sworn to serve and protect. Not search and destroy. And I don't condone what happened in Tucson. :wtf:
01-13-2011, 11:07 PM
#8
justpics
Legislative Bills
that is what I was talking about with the 'per se' limits, gypski.
The plan is to use a bunch of studies which found a correlation between THC blood levels and accident rates, and use that to pretend that they have proven a causation between THC in your blood and impairment.
Nice trick huh?
Can't wait for the study that shows that people who are specific minority groups correlate to higher accident rates so we can set per se limits on being an asian driver...."I am sorry ma'am, studies found a correlation between your ethnic group and accidents so you are therefore impaired"...right?