Results 1 to 8 of 8
-
04-28-2005, 05:18 AM #1OPJunior Member
To Phototron or Not to Phototron
Has anyone had success or failures with these? I am going to start alittle farm in the house and would like some input. Thanks. Remember not to tip it up, and the carb hole is on the bottom. Ironlung
iamironlung Reviewed by iamironlung on . To Phototron or Not to Phototron Has anyone had success or failures with these? I am going to start alittle farm in the house and would like some input. Thanks. Remember not to tip it up, and the carb hole is on the bottom. Ironlung Rating: 5
-
04-28-2005, 05:36 AM #2Senior Member
To Phototron or Not to Phototron
my friend had one in high school back in the 80's he swore by the thing . but no expe.myself
-
04-28-2005, 05:00 PM #3Senior Member
To Phototron or Not to Phototron
You can build something cheeper and even better for growing, if you are good at working with tools. Use the money you saved to buy co² and proper odor control and quality lights and nutrients.
-
04-28-2005, 05:20 PM #4Senior Member
To Phototron or Not to Phototron
Saw this online, thought it would help your decision:
"An Honest Look At The Phototron"
By Dr. Clone
Originally posted at CannabisCulture.com
Publishers Of Cannabis Culture Magazine
PO Box 15, 199 West Hastings
Vancouver BC
Canada V6B 1H4
"Amazing Phototron". I and a few fellow growers have a big problem with the claim of 6 to 8 ounces of bud every 45 days with a puny 250 W (18,000 lumens) of low intensity fluorescent light. You will need at least one 400 W halide to get 6 to 8 ounces of bud every 60 to 70 days.
Fluorescent light gives you 80,000 lumens for each 1,000 watts at 30% efficiency. Metal halide light gives you 110,000 lumens for each 1,000 watts at over 40% efficiency, and the best phototron has 18,000 lumens. About 250 puny watts.
This would explain why any who want real buds use halide lights. Buds are bigger and three times as dense and resin glans will be at least 50% larger. Fluorescent light is not cost efficient for flowering pot.
-
04-28-2005, 10:32 PM #5Senior Member
To Phototron or Not to Phototron
The one and only upside he avoided was the Phototron makes use of full plant lighting by providing side light to the middle and lower parts of the plant.
It works better if you use HPS to flower and use lights that not only light from the top but also from the middle to the lower parts of the plant. Convert that popcorn buds into full blooming resin soaking buds.
-
04-29-2005, 01:14 AM #6Senior Member
To Phototron or Not to Phototron
Im wasnt impressed small plants small bud. never seen one give quanity..
-
04-29-2005, 01:54 AM #7Senior Member
To Phototron or Not to Phototron
here`s an article with pictures on how to build yourself a nice grow cabinet and it wont cost you an arm and a leg
http://www.overgrow.com/article/10
it`s worth the effort and i`d hate to see ya spend that much on something that in my opinion is kind of worthless to grow with.
-
04-29-2005, 04:30 AM #8OPJunior Member
To Phototron or Not to Phototron
Thanks for the info and response. I will check out what you have give...Ironlung
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
phototron led test
By Mal420xl in forum Basic GrowingReplies: 0Last Post: 01-03-2013, 03:30 PM -
Phototron advice???
By shangeet in forum Southern CaliforniaReplies: 7Last Post: 12-19-2010, 11:09 PM -
phototron
By gotmudatv in forum Indoor GrowingReplies: 37Last Post: 01-09-2010, 04:39 AM -
Phototron
By IMed215 in forum HydroponicsReplies: 10Last Post: 11-22-2007, 06:14 PM -
phototron 2
By mrtbone55 in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 0Last Post: 04-06-2006, 01:27 AM