Petition filed with Supreme Court to challenge 1284

[onebrownmouse]

And we are working on other legal means. Thanks for the support. My manic y disease doesn't allow me to walk away or let go--especially, because I'm right. They will hear our arguments.

And I agree, I do not understand why vancefish got axed. I agree with everything he said in this last brilliant post. I went to see who he was when I found him to be banned. So sad. Our loss.

[Delta9Caregivrs]

Yep I agree def lift the ban on vancefish he was not a troublemaker around here.. he was a great poster and is input is requested and valued.. please reconsider

[canniwhatsis]

Well, hopefully I don't get myself banned,.... I just flagged my own post pleading the mods to lift the ban on Vancefish.

[copobo]

word.

it's so hard for the mods to keep up with everyone. seriously!

we need the real people around here!

vancefish is one of us. good local peeps.

I think I might remember what this must refer to. if it has to do w/t2... the wrong one got banned. (in my humble, ever so idiotic opinion :rastasmoke:

[onebrownmouse]

Wow, thanks, Pat Steadman (D), for helping clean up a thin SLICE of the mess you helped create. It's the least you can do, but don't pretend or market it as for the patients.

The only reason patients need you to correct this is because you, (and the majority of) the legislature, voted to pass hb1284. There was no '35 day rule' or confusing debate about it until you all passed it, against the will of the people and the public comment.

And the '35 day rule' only affected people shopping in a MMC and MMC's themselves. Patients still have the right to use their meds immediately after a doctor signs their recommendation. Caregivers or anyone can help supply them. Any patient has the right to the acquisition of their meds.

Too bad the patient privacy issue doesn't affect you with the same urgency. I think patients are more concerned about their privacy, as cannabis use or possession is still federally illegal. The release of patient info to numerous government and law enforcement agencies (dept of revenue, all law enforcement statewide, dept of labor and employment, dmv) means they can/will be closer to eventually losing their job, driver license, children, health insurance, government aid, not to forget their FREEDOM if/when breach occurs.

Saying the Supreme Court will decide patient privacy is BS. You have been working on your language for months now and you didn't know about the Supreme Court filing until Jan 5th, when it was filed. Implying that filing is why patient privacy is not in your language is shameful.

The real reason patient privacy doesn't matter to you is because patients don't have high paid lobbyists, fighting for their rights at the capitol building, like business/industry do.

And I'm sure the '35 day rule' hurt businesses and the industry. Of course it did, because while patients 'waited' the 35 days before they could shop in an MMC, they found a caregiver who could provide for them. Then--who needs a MMC, where they will be under Orwellian surveillance beyond anything ever experienced in US, after they have found a caregiver? The loss of patients MMC's would suffer would probably put them out of business. Yet, you act like your doing a favor for patients? This language is all about business and industry and collecting data on patients---NOT HELPING PATIENTS.

If you want to help the patients, write language to repeal everything unconstitutional you helped pass in HB1284. Having the support of thousands of patients (when your up for re election) is better than the support of a few white, wealthy, mostly out of state lobbyist and their clients. It's amazing what can happen when you do the right thing.

[canaguy27]

And I'm sure the '35 day rule' hurt businesses and the industry. Of course it did, because while patients 'waited' the 35 days before they could shop in an MMC, they found a caregiver who could provide for them. Then--who needs a MMC, where they will be under Orwellian surveillance beyond anything ever experienced in US, after they have found a caregiver? The loss of patients MMC's would suffer would probably put them out of business. Yet, you act like your doing a favor for patients? This language is all about business and industry and collecting data on patients---NOT HELPING PATIENTS.

I keep hearing from MMCs that their below 30 patients are not buying anymore. Once the people above 30 get connected with caregivers, it is going to be hard to be an MMC.

[HighPopalorum]

I think I might remember what this must refer to. if it has to do w/t2... the wrong one got banned. (in my humble, ever so idiotic opinion :rastasmoke:

Awww... C'mon... without me around the only posters left would be commercial growers, MMC owners and their employees, and industry hacks explaining how their businesses should not be regulated.

[copobo]

sorry highpop, wasn't referring to you. unless you are t.t.

[FarmerSteve]

"we need the real people around here!

vancefish is one of us. good local peeps."


Agreed! :thumbsup: