I don't know whether a dispensary model is "appropriate" either, shit, I don't even know what he means by appropriate. I do know that the language of the amendment does not mandate or prohibit such a thing, so I guess that is one more thing that some court (at the district court level) will decide, and the state Court of Appeals will review (assuming the dispensary/grower/definitely defendant has the $ and inclination and time to fight, again) and the state Supreme Court will review the decision of the Court of Appeals(see preceding parenthetical)etc., etc., etc., (see Yul Brynner in The King and I).

I hate to climb back up on my soapbox, with its grooves the exact size of my feet worn to translucence, but this rigamarole is all about this wink,wink, nudge, nudge, (see Eric Idle) "medical" marijuana crap. Marijuana is no more or less "medical" than opium, alcohol, or any other psychoactive substance. We are forced into this intellectually dishonest position by the prohibitionists in our midst of course, but that position is indefensible. The defensible and morally correct position is that we all have the absolute right to ingest the substances we choose without any interference from anyone else, individually or collectively. Just for the fuck of it, prove me wrong.