Is your Dr legal to recommend MMJ? Check here:

[TheReleafCenter]

Via the CDPHE:

https://www.doradls.state.co.us/alison.php

"You can search by physicianâ??s name or license number. Check the third column titled â??License Status"

TheReleafCenter Reviewed by TheReleafCenter on 11-08-2010. Is your Dr legal to recommend MMJ? Check here: Via the CDPHE: https://www.doradls.state.co.us/alison.php "You can search by physicianâ??s name or license number. Check the third column titled â??License Status" Rating: 5

[MEDEDCANNABIS]

Via the CDPHE:

https://www.doradls.state.co.us/alison.php

"You can search by physicianâ??s name or license number. Check the third column titled â??License Status"

good on ya mate. what will happen to us patients in lieu of current legislation, are we grandfathered in or do we need to comply with the new regs when we re-apply?



meded, superior quality

[ottistoys]

Via the CDPHE:

https://www.doradls.state.co.us/alison.php

"You can search by physicianâ??s name or license number. Check the third column titled â??License Status"

thanks Releaf Center for the info.

[copobo]

yea, now you better just hope that your doc is STILL legal in 6 months or so when they get around to opening your application.

[TheReleafCenter]

good on ya mate. what will happen to us patients in lieu of current legislation, are we grandfathered in or do we need to comply with the new regs when we re-apply?



meded, superior quality

Unfortunately, there is no grandfathering. I'd check to make sure your physician is current via the link above and your notary has the correct commission date. The CDPHE is just verifying that you crossed your t's and dotted your i's at this point.

[copobo]

that's pretty special.

Dr. Dean is listed as active and has been on some sort of probation since 1988. It looks like she can still prescribe narcotics, though. So, why not a harmless herb?

https://www.doradls.state.co.us/alis...AxNzE4&t_o_p=0

[copobo]

and it looks like this was all about delivery procedures w/an infant, had NOTHING to do with drugs.

[TheReleafCenter]

that's pretty special.

Dr. Dean is listed as active and has been on some sort of probation since 1988. It looks like she can still prescribe narcotics, though. So, why not a harmless herb?

https://www.doradls.state.co.us/alis...AxNzE4&t_o_p=0

Think the key there is active - with conditions.

[copobo]

I just can't comprehend that they make a retroactive administrative decision nullifying applications of sick people (or any people !) and don't AUTOMATICALLY refund the money?

It's theft, plain and simple. It's one thing to rob the fund to pay for paving streets - but AT LEAST give the people what they paid for or their $$ back.

SICK BASTARDS.

[TheReleafCenter]

I just can't comprehend that they make a retroactive administrative decision nullifying applications of sick people (or any people !) and don't AUTOMATICALLY refund the money?

It's theft, plain and simple. It's one thing to rob the fund to pay for paving streets - but AT LEAST give the people what they paid for or their $$ back.

SICK BASTARDS.

Dr. Dean's pithy response to this really irks me. These physicians have earned hundreds of thousands of dollars off of patients, but she can't refund the fees for anyone who was denied, let alone have another physician in her office see them free of cost?

A patient spends probably $100 to get their initial rec from her, $90 to the state, all of which is lost, then another $50 for the do-over and another $90? $330 to get legal? Ridiculous.