Quote Originally Posted by CannaHub
Don't waste you time one old proposals downloaded through the Freedom of Information Act. Left unchanged, what was a good proposal one or two years ago,
My friend had copies given to him by other producers, at the time they were not old in anyway. now they are outdated, but at the time they were applications which had been recently approved by the DOH.
thats why I think its a good think the DOH is getting sued because when you looked at my friends application, and the approved application (all of which were only a couple months old at the time). there was no difference. but the DOH said he was missing certain things in his application but his application was the same as the applications of people approved.
Im pretty sure the DOH is going to lose the lawsuit, when two applications have the exact same info and are submitted within a couple months of each other. The rules to become a producer had not been modified in anyway(in other words, the requirments were the same nothing had changed when my friends application was sent in..)

SOO...When one person is approved and another person is failed but the info contained in the applications is the same, there needs to be some disclosure on how applications are picked.
MimbresValley Reviewed by MimbresValley on . CANNABIS AT COST, CO-OP/PRODUCER APPLICATION, LNPP BYLAWS/ ARTofINC. PATIENT FEEDBACK Here are the current bylaws for a production application I am currently working on, it is quite different from the model that the other LNNPs have implemented. This is geared to be more of a co-op combined with the current producer model where the number one goal of Cannabis At Cost is, to get medicine to patients at the cheapest possible price. Please Please contribute, feel free to add anything to the bylaws that you think would make the business a success, or anything that would Rating: 5