So seems suffice to say 'Thats in the first amendment....?" is a correct question, Because its not. Coons was presenting a "version" of whats in the cases INTERPRETING the text.....NOT THE LITERAL TEXT OF THE CONSTITUTION. Sooooo, thats NOT an incorrect statement.

The two were trying to set each other up. Everyone who actually watched the entire debate and lives in Delaware already knows this. Thats why the DNC is now having to pour money and time into the Vice President former senate seat. The part about it being at a law school makes it even scarier since clearly these students of law dont know the actual text of the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. Yea.....thats pretty funny alright chuckle chuckle. Seriously......if this is the best the entire leftwing blogosphere can come up with you guys are gonna lose more seats than anyone can imagine. 2 weeks ladies.

Party like its 1773 is also a correct statement. The liberal blogosphere grows more desperate everyday as their own internal polls show the storm brewing.

perhaps you should read the news again
Republicans put 99 Democrat-held House seats in danger - Alex Isenstadt - POLITICO.com