O' Donnell Does't Understand 1st Amendment - Video Included!!

[eastbaygordo]

So seems suffice to say 'Thats in the first amendment....?" is a correct question, Because its not. Coons was presenting a "version" of whats in the cases INTERPRETING the text.....NOT THE LITERAL TEXT OF THE CONSTITUTION. Sooooo, thats NOT an incorrect statement.

The two were trying to set each other up. Everyone who actually watched the entire debate and lives in Delaware already knows this. Thats why the DNC is now having to pour money and time into the Vice President former senate seat. The part about it being at a law school makes it even scarier since clearly these students of law dont know the actual text of the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. Yea.....thats pretty funny alright chuckle chuckle. Seriously......if this is the best the entire leftwing blogosphere can come up with you guys are gonna lose more seats than anyone can imagine. 2 weeks ladies.

Party like its 1773 is also a correct statement. The liberal blogosphere grows more desperate everyday as their own internal polls show the storm brewing.

perhaps you should read the news again
Republicans put 99 Democrat-held House seats in danger - Alex Isenstadt - POLITICO.com

Keep wishing Fantasyland man.

eastbaygordo Reviewed by eastbaygordo on 10-20-2010. O' Donnell Does't Understand 1st Amendment - Video Included!! At least one seat is a sure Democratic lock. The chick doesn't understand the 1st amendment separation of church and state. WILMINGTON, Del. â?? Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware on Tuesday questioned whether the U.S. Constitution calls for a separation of church and state, appearing to disagree or not know that the First Amendment bars the government from establishing religion. The exchange came in a debate before an audience of legal scholars and law students Rating: 5

[GoldenBoy812]

So seems suffice to say 'Thats in the first amendment....?" is a correct question, Because its not. Coons was presenting a "version" of whats in the cases INTERPRETING the text.....NOT THE LITERAL TEXT OF THE CONSTITUTION. Sooooo, thats NOT an incorrect statement.

You can only spin so much.

She is a constitutional expert based on 7 days of attending a Claremont Institute fellowship. :thumbsup:

[Islandborn]

LOL, fine....dont argue with me about it, argue with the esteemed Clinical Law Professor at Cornell University.
Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion: What If Christine O'Donnell Were Right About The First Amendment?

This is a mere distraction the liberal blogosphere is attempting to run. Coons does NOT have a big lead in Delaware anymore. Bet ya that. Who knows if O'Donnel can win, not me......but its gonna be close cause the Dems are sweatin it BIG TIME.

Get your early vote on:thumbsup:

[Islandborn]

There is even broken down examples of how the media tried to manipulate this one and got BUSTED. Here is just one you can find online now.

Nice try though
http://patterico.com/2010/10/20/wapo...-a-correction/

LMAO......the WASHINGTON POST gets BUSTED. And all the suckers that tried to spread this LAME unfactual storyimp: