Results 1 to 10 of 11
Threaded View
-
10-18-2010, 01:15 AM #6OPSenior Member
Cal Supreme Court Ruling on MMJ - People v. Kelly
Originally Posted by gypski
The Voters of California rule their State.When they voted in 1996 that medical users could grow as much as they needed, they meant it. The Cali congress has no constitutional right to "fine tune" it, as they did with SB 420. SB 420 is unconstitutional but it is allowed to stand as a guideline but is trumped by medical need and other privacy rights.
No other State in the union has anything close to the power that the voters of California have. :smokin:
Similar Threads
-
Has the Recent State Supreme Court Ruling Affected You?
By Club420 in forum Washington (WA)Replies: 2Last Post: 02-05-2010, 07:50 AM -
Wa. State v. Jason Fry: supreme ct. ruling
By jamessr in forum LegalReplies: 14Last Post: 01-24-2010, 09:53 PM -
Californias supreme court Patrick Kelly Case
By Hypomaniac in forum LegalReplies: 0Last Post: 10-20-2008, 08:35 PM -
McCain blasts Supreme Court's Guantanamo ruling
By Psycho4Bud in forum PoliticsReplies: 64Last Post: 06-18-2008, 06:22 AM -
Supreme Court delivers blow to property rights; ruling in Conn. case has Toledo...
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 1Last Post: 08-07-2005, 06:22 PM