Results 1 to 10 of 16
Hybrid View
-
09-29-2010, 08:03 PM #1
OPSenior Member
Department of Revenue on the "35 day" rule
Like I said, it was technically in place. As "big caregivers", as you put it, we could raise an affirmative defense. Now the protection we had under A20 is gone. Pretty sure we're saying the same thing. Although, according to the city attorney, they'll prosecute anyone in the first 35 days, regardless of where it was purchased. I brought up the aff defense, haven't heard back yet.
Originally Posted by canaguy27
I was denied after 35 days because of a problem with the notary. I consider myself approved. :thumbsup:TheReleafCenter Reviewed by TheReleafCenter on . Department of Revenue on the "35 day" rule Full text here: http://www.colorado.gov/cs/Satellite?blobcol=urldata&blobheader=application/pdf&blobkey=id&blobtable=MungoBlobs&blobwhere=1251659488306&ssbinary=true They're threatening any MMC who serves a patient in the 35 day waiting period. Rating: 5
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
Department of Revenue Medical Marijuana Website is UP!
By MMDInsuranceCo in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 2Last Post: 07-01-2010, 09:37 PM -
Matt Cook from Department of Revenue mtg on HB 1284
By MMDInsuranceCo in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 4Last Post: 06-07-2010, 01:14 AM -
Chris Romer: "The Department of Revenue will regulate it with guns,"
By RockwellHG in forum Colorado (CO)Replies: 19Last Post: 04-21-2010, 04:41 PM -
If the Iraqis Get Revenue Sharing, Exxon Gets Their Oil
By fishman3811 in forum PoliticsReplies: 0Last Post: 04-30-2007, 08:26 AM










Register To Reply
Staff Online