I agree with wreckinger's take on this. Everything the defendants did met the intent of the law and the presiding judge made the right decision. But this is the problem with the system, if the prosecutor doesn't like the judges decision he just shops around and finds a new judge more amenable to his viewpoint. The prosecutor also has the legal ability to have a judge removed from a case with absolutely no evidence that the judge was being biased in any way.
Its a corrupt system but its the only one we have. Get on these juries and help the people being persecuted.

Yeah gypski, I don't like the money issue any more than you do but thats capitalism for you. Its the price we pay for living in a semi free society.
killerweed420 Reviewed by killerweed420 on . Court rules THCF clinic is a fraud Ouch, THCF does not qualify as an authorizing health care practitioner to write mmj authorizations and as it turns out even a good faith effort on the part of a patient to have an on going (more than once a year) patient relationship with THCF is not tantamount to an ongoing relationship with your health care practitioner. They have been found to provide fraudulent documentation, and now that you know you could be convicted for marijuana crimes without being able to present the statutory Rating: 5