Quote Originally Posted by postableme
I'm interested in learning what the outcome and ramifications of such cases are.

However, it would be much more useful to the layperson if they were discussed in a clear and concise manner, and without resorting to namecalling. Otherwise, most people simply won't read it, and probably won't be nearly as interested in reading those people's posts in the future.

I'm just sayin'.
Hi chet,

Glad to know your interested in "these type of cases" but, it should be that the poster is irrelevant to the information being posted, especially in these types of cases...if people miss the info. because of the person giving the same message with the same data...well then I guess one can be as color blind as they wish...

The real issue here is I don't hold back "anything" related too or against THCF period...they violate every public policy known in the healthcare community...I.E. PAUL STANFORD IS A FRAUD AND CROOK..

It would behoove us all for the doc-in-the-boxes to go away..as this is why these cases arise...because as the concurring judge shows us...this is completely wrong.