KW,

You must have missed this part here:
At the time of the preliminary examination Dr. Eisenbud had worked for the past 19 months for The Hemp and Cannabis Foundation (THCF) Medical Clinic. He testified that he is "not from Michigan" and was currently working in six out of the seven states in which he is licensed to practice medicine, although he later suggested that he was working in all seven states.

This is a THCF case, not some other case involving some other clinic or doctors...

This is not the only case which shows the patient-doctor relationship was the view point of the appeal...this is not a political case..it is explicitly a public policy case of the learned professions doctrine...pay attention here please.

THIS CASE EXPLICITLY SHOWS THCF IS GIVING PATIENTS FRAUDULENT DOCUMENTAION!!! THIS WILL SNOWBALL INTO WA...REAL SOON LIKE...

Remember my case in wa. touches all these same legal issues and more!! I don't see any patient with thcf documentation getting any love from our strict wa. courts...do you?? If so please explain how this would work.