Results 1 to 10 of 28
Threaded View
-
09-17-2010, 06:18 PM #21Senior Member
PROPOSITION 19, MONSANTO, AND TERMINATOR CANNABIS
Originally Posted by justpics
You most certainly CAN patent a plant if it didn't exist in nature previously.
For example, I have a rosebush. You will NEVER find this genetic combination in the wild (due to the massive distances that separated the parent genetics,) and it is quite firmly patented, with a metal tag and the patent numbers. Since the two strains are so far apart that they can't be bred, but close enough that they can be grafted on to each other, and due to a plants ability to insert genes into other grafted tissue, a new bloom emerges. This grafting combination whereupon the plant itself does the genetic modification to produce something not possible in the wild is patentable.
Looking up the patent numbers shows ABSOLUTELY NO genetic marking.
If you want to know the particular type of rose I am talking about, it is called 'Dream Come True' and it is a yellow rose with pink-tipped petals.
This ends our regularly scheduled educational quip. Back to you, David.
Similar Threads
-
Monsanto cannabis yes or no? The DNA Protection Act of 2013
By DNAprotection in forum ActivismReplies: 2Last Post: 12-23-2012, 10:38 PM -
a proposition in 2010
By thedeadone in forum ActivismReplies: 2Last Post: 06-02-2009, 02:52 PM -
a small proposition
By dankman in forum Marijuana MethodsReplies: 6Last Post: 08-12-2006, 12:39 AM -
San Francisco Gun Ban A Losing Proposition
By pisshead in forum PoliticsReplies: 0Last Post: 09-14-2005, 06:15 PM