Quote Originally Posted by u.g.u
khyberkitsune

I am not talking about the rigid PVC I am talking about soft flexible PVC.
I must have posted the wrong picture, one sec.

There. See all the nice PVC tubing there? All that SOFT PVC.

Not my fault if you're using chemicals that directly release the stuff.

And we're running systems that contain AT LEAST 250x what your little hoses have.

Also:

"I have been talking to the company that made the offending tube for 4 months and they do not wish to resolve this problem even though I have proof that the toxic chemical is in the tube."

It's NOT THEIR FAULT. It's the fault of the PLASTIC SUPPLIER, not the PRODUCT MANUFACTURER.

It's called the chain of production. You skipped several links, and went to the end-retailer.

NGW doesn't even make their own tubing in the first place. You're directing a lawsuit against the wrong people. You should be suing the plastic manufacturer/supplier that claimed the plastic was safe for horticultural production, not NGW.

Don't have much experience in the field of litigation, do you? I've got plenty of it, from owning Electronic Arts in court (McQuown vs Electronic Arts,) to many other smaller lower-profile cases.

Your logic regarding whom to sue is highly flawed.

There will only be a settlement, the majority of which the lawyer will receive, and you'll be stuck with at best a meager pittance unless you're a direct class representative, in which case you'll get only a slightly larger pittance.

In the meantime, the company that actually manufactures the plastic will still be making that bad plastic and selling it to other companies to make products.

In other words, your lawsuit won't stop this. You don't even know where to aim the gun at in the first place.