Plenty of people have talked to the media and haven't been raided.

The core issue, from what I understand, is he was running about 18 plants per patient. His defense was that a caregiver can have as many plants as they want because A20 only limited the number of plants a patient can possess.

He has a right to that interpretation, but that all goes out the window once it's a federal case. I wouldn't consider it a case of clear and unambiguous compliance, but it's a moot point.