I've always wondered why the affirmative defense has not been tested, or has it? Isn't the recommendation for 'edibles' the reason for extended plant count? And that's based on what it takes to produce the usable medicine. What do your medical records have to do with your choice to medicate without smoking? Isn't 'it takes 5 times as many plants to produce the medicine to provide the same pain relieving effect' the defense? Shallow I know but just a thought I've had.