Quote Originally Posted by cannasense
James, once again you've not only wrong but your comments show just how little you understand about how the law works. The relevant portion of the document the tells the board's reasoning behind their decision is here:

...The board did not say that there was no medical use. They based
their decision on cannabis lacking accepted safety for use in treatment under medical supervision. The board noted in its conclusion that sufficient questions exist about the safety of medical marijuana given its variability in strength, lack of standardization, and uncertainty about dosing. All of these, (consistency in strength, standardization and dosing certainty) are indicators for a medication of pharmacological quality and controls. Marijuana does not have the pharmacological attributes necessary for accepted safety in use for treatment under medical supervision. Therefore, the board concluded that marijuana lacks accepted safety in treatment under medical supervision particularly with current methods of distribution or acquisition, so it was appropriate to keep marijuana as a schedule I controlled substance.

I'm not saying you have to agree with their decision. But if you disagree why not figure out how to disagree without mischaracterizing the reason for their decision? To characterize the board's denial of the petition as being based on marijuana's status as an herb is untrue. The AAG is however correct, marijuana is an herb (Marijuana is an Herb).

Also James, I'd like to propose that you weren't convicted because marijuana is an herb, you were convicted because your as inept at being a criminal as you are in interpreting the law.

BTW, do you have a case number yet for your appeal?
Just in case you have any clue at what your talking about..I posted the "AAG" claimed it was an herb and the bop had no jurisdiction to even say shit about it, one way or the other...what does their attorney have anything to do with it? They are the sole state councel which tells them bears where to poop in the woods...they said thems woods is an "herb"..and you have no say so either way..end of debate...

Here is the actual bottom legal line:
Ms. Roper also noted that this board does not regulate herbal substances. The Board of Pharmacyâ??s
authority relates to legend drugs and substances available at pharmacies
Question has been called to end the debate.

It don't matter what the bop wrote or why..it is "immaterial"..."irrelevant"... just like what you post any place on the web..about anything or anybody.

Your a no-body, immaterial in any mmj movement, irrelevant to the cause..:thumbsup:

If I do have a case # for my appeal, it is none of your damn business...and is public record..so happy hunting..go fish elsewhere troll.