Quote Originally Posted by jamessr
In this pdf there is a section about the rescheduling of cannabis filed by John Worthington, Steve Sarich, and a few others in the political fight here in Washington attempting to stop our government from playing hide the weinny...starting on pg 5.

So upon push comes to shove the AAG comes out and says the board of pharmacy doesn't have "JURISDICTION" to regulate "an HERB"!!!!!!!!!!!!!

EXCUSE ME?????? WWWWWWWTTTTTTTTFFFFFFF???????? an "herb"?

Oh, I see now how this state plays hide the weinny...convict me for possession of a fucken "HERB !! :wtf::wtf:

Thanks for the pdf guys..got to love ya..
James, once again you've not only wrong but your comments show just how little you understand about how the law works. The relevant portion of the document the tells the board's reasoning behind their decision is here:

...The board did not say that there was no medical use. They based
their decision on cannabis lacking accepted safety for use in treatment under medical supervision. The board noted in its conclusion that sufficient questions exist about the safety of medical marijuana given its variability in strength, lack of standardization, and uncertainty about dosing. All of these, (consistency in strength, standardization and dosing certainty) are indicators for a medication of pharmacological quality and controls. Marijuana does not have the pharmacological attributes necessary for accepted safety in use for treatment under medical supervision. Therefore, the board concluded that marijuana lacks accepted safety in treatment under medical supervision particularly with current methods of distribution or acquisition, so it was appropriate to keep marijuana as a schedule I controlled substance.

I'm not saying you have to agree with their decision. But if you disagree why not figure out how to disagree without mischaracterizing the reason for their decision? To characterize the board's denial of the petition as being based on marijuana's status as an herb is untrue. The AAG is however correct, marijuana is an herb (Marijuana is an Herb).

Also James, I'd like to propose that you weren't convicted because marijuana is an herb, you were convicted because your as inept at being a criminal as you are in interpreting the law.

BTW, do you have a case number yet for your appeal?
cannasense Reviewed by cannasense on . WASHINGTON STATE AAG CLAIMS MJ IS AN HERB In this pdf there is a section about the rescheduling of cannabis filed by John Worthington, Steve Sarich, and a few others in the political fight here in Washington attempting to stop our government from playing hide the weinny...starting on pg 5. So upon push comes to shove the AAG comes out and says the board of pharmacy doesn't have "JURISDICTION" to regulate "an HERB"!!!!!!!!!!!!! EXCUSE ME?????? WWWWWWWTTTTTTTTFFFFFFF???????? an "herb"? Oh, I see now how this state plays hide Rating: 5