Paragraph 7 states that if a city decides to not tax and regulate Cannabis, then it shall remain illegal to buy and sell Cannabis within the cities limits, BUT it says ??that the city's citizens still have the right to possess and consume small amounts, except as permitted under?, and then it cites 215 and SB 420.

Does this protect medical Cannabis patients right to possess and consume under 215? Yes.

Does it protect their right to cultivate? No, the right to cultivate is not mentioned or protected in that paragraph.


Paragraph 8 is very similar to Paragraph 7, though instead of protecting the right to ??possess and consume? under 215 and SB 420, it protects the right to ??buy and sell?.

Does this protect the right to cultivate under 215? No, again cultivation is not mentioned.


Section C, Paragraph 1 lists many of the laws which are intended to be limited by Prop 19 and states ??This Act is intended to limit the application and enforcement of state and local laws relating to?cultivation?of cannabis, including but not limited to the following?, the act then fails to list 215.

Does this mean that prop 19 was NOT intended to ??limit the application? of 215? No.

The Paragraph clearly states that the laws which are intended to be limited are NOT ??limited to the following??, meaning that the list is NOT exhaustive and COULD include 215

This means that prop 19 does NOT specifically protect 215 from being limited. If prop 19 was NOT intended to limit 215, why wasn??t 215 listed in Paragraph 2 of Section C? Does 215 relate to public health? Yes. Is this list intended to be exhaustive? Yes, because unlike in Paragraph 1 of the same Section, Paragraph 2 does not include the phrase ??not limited to the following?, which means that out of all the laws that were NOT intended to be limited by prop 19, 215 is NOT ONE OF THEM