"Please post the materials and methods used in this Urban Legend."

Urban Legend, something done by scientists with more education and knowledge than I?

I gave the post - if you can't afford to pay to see the full study, that isn't my issue.

You call it an urban legend, the burden of proof is upon *YOU* and nobody else.

Start conducting your own double-blind study.

"FR (Far Red) affects photoperiodism and photopigmentosynthesis (THC) both and both affect over all THC production."

We've *JUST* discovered that IR has barely enough energy potential to cause basic photosynthesis.

Chlorophyll Gets An ââ?¬Ë?fââ?¬â?¢ - Science News

Just FYI - IR has NOWHERE near enough energy on its own to stimulate Pfr. Once you understand the required energy levels for a molecular bond split or joining, then you may keep talking about this subject, until then, you're out of your league, understanding, and knowledge, and I highly advise you to stop talking about something you have no real knowledge about.

Want more sources? Rauber discovered NOTHING, not in that time period.

If and when? Best read this while the information is still BRAND NEW and I'm one of the leading researchers in this field, seriously. Otherwise you're going to get left behind.

"Remember, information is always correct, it's the assumptions as to it's meaning that are always wrong if their is any wrong to it."

That in itself is nonsense as well purely by the scientific method. There is no wrong, only additional data. Information is not EVER correct, just proven true by repeated experiments. Now you're trying to severely discredit the scientific method, just like what was attempted in the 60s. Do you not have more up to date KGB agents? The DEA over here has been well ahead of that nonsense for at least two decades.

Care to continue this pointless and fruitless argument? You're trying to bypass scientifically-locked processes. Good luck with that. You don't even have the logic to counteract the double-blind proof.