Results 31 to 40 of 58
Hybrid View
-
08-07-2010, 01:01 AM#1
OPSenior Member
contacting co-ops with overage?
who makes this stupid shit up? the same guy who made up religion? so basically the courts are going to go after "mother earth" then right? for producing us, and a plant, because its the one accountable for producing EVERYTHING we have.3 : the act or process of producing something
how are we the only species that has created something of its own kind to kill itself? do sharks get together and say hey lets go eat earl, because he tasted water that had a higher oxygen rating? i dont think so. but we let our own kind kill each other over something that earth put here, something we can not avoid.G13budsmoker Reviewed by G13budsmoker on . contacting co-ops with overage? well ill probly get in trouble for asking this one but here goes. im no lawyer so i dont know all the legalities, but is it possible to contact co-ops regaurds to them needing/recieving product? i have enough saved for me that i dont need all of what i got, and i would like to see other patients happy too. i know people are upset about the prices they "donate" for there meds, so i just want to actualy "help" other patients out by donating meds to a co-op for cheaper then norm so that in turn Rating: 5
-
08-07-2010, 01:59 AM#2
justpics
contacting co-ops with overage?
the law places no restrictions on what you can charge.
Originally Posted by G13budsmoker
Register To ReplyAdvertisements
08-07-2010, 06:15 AM
#3
Senior Member
contacting co-ops with overage?
Huh? What law are you referencing here above? Cause if you didn't notice...affirmative defense to criminal charges so far is all we have..those charges being distribution which no defense is available..yet!! if there is most are ignorant then.
The csa is strict liability crimes with cannabis L. Sativa...the rcw 69.51A et. seq. statute and legislative intent are missing the ingredients for sales/distribution aff. def. outside a "provider"...logical sense says, what it cost the provider to produce the substance...and they follow this strictly...regardless. It is upon the prosecuting state authority if they recognize rcw 9.94A.411 here:
Evidentiary sufficiency.
(1) Decision not to prosecute.
STANDARD: A prosecuting attorney may decline to prosecute, even though technically sufficient evidence to prosecute exists, in situations where prosecution would serve no public purpose, would defeat the underlying purpose of the law in question or would result in decreased respect for the law.
GUIDELINE/COMMENTARY:
Examples
The following are examples of reasons not to prosecute which could satisfy the standard.
(a) Contrary to Legislative Intent - It may be proper to decline to charge where the application of criminal sanctions would be clearly contrary to the intent of the legislature in enacting the particular statute.
(b) Antiquated Statute - It may be proper to decline to charge where the statute in question is antiquated in that:
(i) It has not been enforced for many years; and
(ii) Most members of society act as if it were no longer in existence; and
(iii) It serves no deterrent or protective purpose in today's society; and
(iv) The statute has not been recently reconsidered by the legislature.
This reason is not to be construed as the basis for declining cases because the law in question is unpopular or because it is difficult to enforce.
(c) De Minimis Violation - It may be proper to decline to charge where the violation of law is only technical or insubstantial and where no public interest or deterrent purpose would be served by prosecution.
RCW 9.94A.411: Evidentiary sufficiency.
08-07-2010, 06:23 AM
#4
Senior Member
contacting co-ops with overage?
American society made this shit up...before you was a twinkle in your mothers eye...mine also...
Yes they talk about earl..and how tasty he is going to be, and they even flip fins to see who is 1st...ever heard of feeding frenzy?
We kill each other over greed and control...human instinct...fight or flight..
Mother earth = $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ corporate $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
08-07-2010, 06:27 AM
#5
justpics
contacting co-ops with overage?
what are you talking about? Designated PROVIDERS are allowed to PROVIDE medicine to their patient for whom they are a PROVIDER.
Designated Providers have an affirmative defense and shall not be found guilty from "assisting in the medical use of marijuana"..."...a crime under state law for assisting with the medical use of marijuana"
Medical Use of Marijuana is defined under the law as, "the production, possession, or administration of marijuana"
One of the ways that designated providers, "assist in the medical use of marijuana" is through its administration, by delivering (distributing) marijuana that they have grown or otherwise acquired, to the patient. Look up the word administration, you'll find that the administration of medicine includes the dispensing thereof.
That's not illegal. And there is nothing in RCW 69.51A which says you may not charge as a Designated Provider. Which brings us back to what I said originally, which is, the law places no restrictions on what you may or may not specifically charge to be someone's designated provider.
Staff Online