I think this here is where it's at below, this neighbor has history well documented. The surveillance part is even more documented, which involves multiple state/county agencies...just means asking for the records..public disclosure:thumbsup:...

RCW 9A.46.110 defines the elements of ??stalking.? According to the relevant portions of the statute:
(1) A person commits the crime of stalking if, without lawful authority and under circumstances not amounting to a felony attempt of another crime:
(a) He or she intentionally and repeatedly harasses or repeatedly follows another person; and
(b) The person being harassed or followed is placed in fear that the stalker intends to injure the person ? . The feeling of fear must be one that a reasonable person in the same situation would experience under all the circumstances; and
(c) The stalker either:
(i) Intends to frighten, intimidate, or harass the person; or
(ii) Knows or reasonably should know that the person is afraid, intimidated, or harassed even if the stalker did not intend to place the person in fear or intimidate or harass the person.
RCW 9A.46.110 (emphasis added).

For purposes of the stalking statute:


RCW 9A.46.110 (emphasis added). For purposes of the stalking statute:
(a) ??Follows? means [***10] deliberately maintaining visual or physical proximity to a specific person over a period of time. ?

(b) ??Harasses? means unlawful harassment as defined in RCW 10.14.020.
Former RCW 9A.46.110(6) (2006) (emphasis added). Under RCW 10.14.020:
[*527] (1) ??Unlawful harassment? means a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person which seriously alarms, annoys, harasses, or is detrimental to such person, and which serves no legitimate or lawful purpose. The course of conduct shall be such as would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, and shall actually cause substantial emotional distress ?
"Surveillance" is defined as to keep a "'close watch . . . over one or more persons.'" Noah, 103 Wn. App. at 44 (quoting WEBSTER'S THIRD NEW INTERNATIONAL DICTIONARY 2302 (1993), In Noah, the court discussed activities that are included within the definition of "surveillance." The court first described three clear restraints in the antiharassment order relating specifically to surveillance: (a) making any attempt to keep the petitioner or his workplace or home [*673] under surveillance; (b) photographing or videotaping persons entering or leaving petitioner's building; and (c) aiding or abetting in any way any person or persons, or acting in concert in any way with any person or persons or acting by proxy (to include Francine Casebeer or June Noah), in doing any of the things which are prohibited to Respondent himself in this court order. Noah, 103 Wn. App. at 40. In discussing these provisions, the court noted that "[p]hotographs and videotapes constitute records of visual surveillance." Id. at 42.
This conduct clearly is consistent with the definition of "to keep a close watch over." Similarly, the court in Burchell concluded that the conduct there met definition of surveillance. Burchell, 74 Wn. App.