My Neighbor

[boaz]

^ or it could be a "secret" skull and boner house. :stoned:

[jamessr]

I think this here is where it's at below, this neighbor has history well documented. The surveillance part is even more documented, which involves multiple state/county agencies...just means asking for the records..public disclosure:thumbsup:...

RCW 9A.46.110 defines the elements of â??stalking.â?� According to the relevant portions of the statute:
(1) A person commits the crime of stalking if, without lawful authority and under circumstances not amounting to a felony attempt of another crime:
(a) He or she intentionally and repeatedly harasses or repeatedly follows another person; and
(b) The person being harassed or followed is placed in fear that the stalker intends to injure the person â?¦ . The feeling of fear must be one that a reasonable person in the same situation would experience under all the circumstances; and
(c) The stalker either:
(i) Intends to frighten, intimidate, or harass the person; or
(ii) Knows or reasonably should know that the person is afraid, intimidated, or harassed even if the stalker did not intend to place the person in fear or intimidate or harass the person.
RCW 9A.46.110 (emphasis added).

For purposes of the stalking statute:


RCW 9A.46.110 (emphasis added). For purposes of the stalking statute:
(a) â??Followsâ?� means [***10] deliberately maintaining visual or physical proximity to a specific person over a period of time. â?¦

(b) â??Harassesâ?� means unlawful harassment as defined in RCW 10.14.020.
Former RCW 9A.46.110(6) (2006) (emphasis added). Under RCW 10.14.020:
[*527] (1) â??Unlawful harassmentâ?� means a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person which seriously alarms, annoys, harasses, or is detrimental to such person, and which serves no legitimate or lawful purpose. The course of conduct shall be such as would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, and shall actually cause substantial emotional distress â?¦
"Surveillance" is defined as to keep a "'close watch . . . over one or more persons.'" Noah, 103 Wn. App. at 44 (quoting WEBSTER'S THIRD NEW INTERNATIONAL DICTIONARY 2302 (1993), In Noah, the court discussed activities that are included within the definition of "surveillance." The court first described three clear restraints in the antiharassment order relating specifically to surveillance: (a) making any attempt to keep the petitioner or his workplace or home [*673] under surveillance; (b) photographing or videotaping persons entering or leaving petitioner's building; and (c) aiding or abetting in any way any person or persons, or acting in concert in any way with any person or persons or acting by proxy (to include Francine Casebeer or June Noah), in doing any of the things which are prohibited to Respondent himself in this court order. Noah, 103 Wn. App. at 40. In discussing these provisions, the court noted that "[p]hotographs and videotapes constitute records of visual surveillance." Id. at 42.
This conduct clearly is consistent with the definition of "to keep a close watch over." Similarly, the court in Burchell concluded that the conduct there met definition of surveillance. Burchell, 74 Wn. App.

[gypski]

For the record, I have spoken with the Executive Manager of the DexOne Corporations Claims department. Their legal department is also aware of this issue. And, I was asked what Dexone wanted me to do to rectify the situation. I told them my wishes, and at this time, they are being acted upon. I was told by this representative, that NO ONE other then Dexone, Inc and its subsidiaries and licensed agents are authorized to use the Image or cutout of Dex in any manner, shape or form.

So, in the famous words of Ricky Ricardo, "Lucy, somebody got some splainin' to do!!!"

I don't blame Dex or Dexone, but somebody has to pay for the misuse and negligence in the control of their trademarked instruments.

[jamessr]

I could have sworn i saw dex himself being used as kindling to start a fire last weekend...lol. What a way to go.com:stoned:

[gypski]

I have received a response from the FCC, and have received the form to file, at this point, an informal complaint. I will await doing that until I hear back from Dex's executive manager/claims or their legal department. The heat is staying on with no let up. Its time citizens learned you can't harass or intimidate medical marijuana patients just like you can't harass gays and get away with it.

[jamessr]

I have received a response from the FCC, and have received the form to file, at this point, an informal complaint. I will await doing that until I hear back from Dex's executive manager/claims or their legal department. The heat is staying on with no let up. Its time citizens learned you can't harass or intimidate medical marijuana patients just like you can't harass gays and get away with it.

Wonder what lucy has to say? But Rickie? :thumbsup:

Nice analogy....and on point.

[gypski]

Fucking amazing....today since the rain is coming, we covered the garden of medical plants by and for authorized medical patients, and not an hour later, first a plane flew over and circled, and then a helicopter just passed over not fifteen minutes ago. I hope the spying neighbor isn't hoping to collect the $5K reward because they and DexOne are going to be charged with harassment, and filing false complaints with the county to draw attention to what people are trying to do legally while maintaining their privacy. Now, that is gone but look out motherfucker because you aren't going to win this one. :cursing:

Bring it on. :thumbsup: