Quote Originally Posted by cologrower420
If you consider the term 'caregiver' to include people currently non-compliant with state law, then we can't agree on much more. I would argue that your definition of caregiver needs to be updated with this new legislation. I'm just trying to be precise, you're acting like a child by insisting that all people who grow pot are automatically NOT ALLOWED to be bad people, such as someone who operates a meth lab.
Why do you continue to insult me and then try to tell me I'm the one insulting you?

Quote Originally Posted by cologrower420
I consider you to be a caregiver. If Bartkowicz got busted tomorrow, I wouldn't call him a caregiver, and I would caution you doing the same, due to all of the negativity surrounding this in Colorado right now. Do you also consider Bartkowicz to be a caregiver if he was busted tomorrow?
Yes, if he had paperwork to grow for all those patients he was a caregiver. znot a very smart one but, he was in no different possition than the government is putting all MMC's in. An illegal one.

Quote Originally Posted by cologrower420
I'm just asking for us to be precise. Your assumptions and interpretations of what caregiver means are preventing you from getting passed that and having a simple conversation.
My interpretation of a caregiver comes from the Colorado Constitution article 18 section 14. Where do you get yours?

Quote Originally Posted by cologrower420
You're still pissed that I compared caregivers to meth labs. I still haven't seen you address anything related to these two examples. Now that I've spent 100 posts getting this example, would you mind answering it? You seem so enraged by the subject of the original post, I tried to tweak it to get the answer I was looking for, and you're still talking about my original comment and the exact words that I used.
Illegal is illegal you know that. You just want to continue to insult people.

Quote Originally Posted by cologrower420
We're passed the fact that we don't see eye to eye on what the word 'caregiver' means. I'm trying to get to how authorities will enforce this new legislation, etc. I'm not personally attacking you. I question that you comprehend my posts. That's not an insult. I could easily be doing it wrong, so don't be offended. That's why I have tried to give a few different examples, but it seems we're still on the original complaint, which is your assumption that I compared legal to illegal.

I am interested in comparing illegal to illegal. Do you understand? That's why these stupid posts get deleted.
It's all illegal under federal law so if you're going to put non compliant growers in with the meth cooks they why arent you attaching MMC's also?

Quote Originally Posted by cologrower420
I am asking and looking to have a discussion about a very specific thing. If you think I am trolling, I am trying to generate discussion about a topic that is important to me and others here, I assume.
Seems more like you just throwing around insults. Every chance you get you compare growers to meth labs. Why? my guess is to get under peoples skin.

Quote Originally Posted by cologrower420
For example, if you had simply got over your initial rage of thinking I called you growers meth heads, or something, and just posted your opinion, then I could have what I want, which is a lighthearted discussion or debate on current social policies. I'm bored at work. Instead, I try to have a discussion, you post what a moron I am for comparing 'meth lab operators' to caregivers. I always tried to set this example using a situation where two places got busted, presumably by the dea. A meth lab, and a guy growing 99+ plants. Both illegal in the eyes of state and federal drug laws.
LOL rage.. One more time for you. Under the Colorado Constitution caregivers have no patient limit.

Quote Originally Posted by cologrower420
Get it?
Yes and I've gone over this with you multiple times. Maybe you keep acting like nobody has discussed this with you because you know all the posts were deleted? I'm not real sure why you keep playing damsel in distress.

Quote Originally Posted by cologrower420
Here is the simple question: Would those two examples be treated the same, differently? Why?
LOL wow lets try this again.... Yes they would both more than likely be treated the same. BUT so would MMC's because under federal law they will be operating illegally if they have more than 16 patients. Why you would the annology of a meth lab in the MJ field is just disturbing.